(c) set out the facts on which the application is based; (d) Indicate the nature of the evidence to show that there are facts justifying revision of the judgment, and that the time limit laid down in Article 92 has been observed. 3. The application must be made against all parties to the case in which the contested judgment was given. Article 94 1. Without prejudice to its decision on the substance, the Court, in closed session, shall, after hearing the parties and having regard to the written observations of the parties, give in the form of a judgment its decision on the admissibility of the application. 2. If the Court finds the application admissible, it shall proceed to consider the Substance of the application and shall give its decision in the form of a judgment in accordance with these Rules. 3. The original of the revising judgment shall be annexed to the original of the Judgment revised. A note of the revising judgment shall be made in the margin of the original of the judgment revised. CHAPTER VI INTERPRETATION OF JUDGMENTS Article 95 1. An application for interpretation of a judgment under Article 23 of the Protocol shall be made in accordance with Articles 32 and 33 of these Rules. In addition it shall specify: (a) The judgment in question; (b) The passages of which interpretation is sought. 2. The application must be made against all the parties to the case in which the judgment was given. 3. The Court shall give its decision in the form of a judgment after having given the parties an opportunity to submit their observations and after hearing the parties. . 4. The original of the interpreting judgment shall be annexed to the original of the judgment interpreted. 5. A note of the interpreting judgment shall be made in the margin of the original of the judgment interpreted.