Dicas de pesquisa
sorted by
Cards viewTable viewMap view
30 shown of 1458 entities

005/2015 – Thobias Mang'ara Mango e Shukurani Masegenya Mango v. Tanzania - Resumo de caso

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Acórdão
Palavras-Chave
  • Direito ao Julgamento Justo
  • Direito de Ser Ouvido
  • Prisão e Detenção Arbitrárias
Resumo do Caso
Thobias Mang’ara Mango and Mr. Shukurani Masegenya Mango (both citizens of the United Republic of Tanzania) allege a violation of their rights following their arrest, detention and the manner in which their various cases were treated before the domestic courts of the Respondent State in relation to the charges and conviction for armed robbery against them.
Estado
  • Tanzânia
Direitos Violados
  • CADHP 7 : Direito ao Julgamento Justo
Country Geolocation
Tanzania: 6° 22′ 9″ S, 34° 53′ 20″ E
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

App. No. 002 2014 – Faustin Uwintije v. Republic of Rwanda

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Ordem
Palavras-Chave
  • Admissibilidade
  • Procedimento do Tribunal Africano
Resumo do Caso
This is an order informing the applicant that the said application does not meet the requirements under Rule 34 of the Rules of the Court and as such, it cannot be entertained by the Court.
Estado
  • Ruanda
Direitos Violados
  • Não indicado
Country Geolocation
Rwanda: 1° 56′ 25″ S, 29° 52′ 26″ E
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

003 2017 Interpretation of the Judgment of 18 November 2016 Actions pour la Protection des Droits de l'Homme V. Republic of Cote D'Ivoire

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Interpretação do pronunciamento
Palavras-Chave
  • Direito à Igualdade perante a Lei
  • Eleições / Referendo
  • Interpretation of Case
  • Justiça transitória
  • Participação no Governo
Resumo do Caso
This is an Application for Interpretation of the Judgment of 18 November 20 16 in the Matter of Actions Pour la Protection des Droits de L'Homme v. Republic of Cote d' Ivoire
Estado
  • Côte d'Ivoire
Direitos Violados
  • CADHP 13.2: Direito de igualdade de acesso ao serviço público do país
  • CADHP 13.3: Direito de acesso a bens e serviços públicos
  • CADHP 3: Direito à igualdade perante a lei e proteção igual à lei
Country Geolocation
Côte d'Ivoire: 7° 32′ 24″ N, 5° 32′ 49″ W
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

Mtilika v Tanzania Ruling on Reparation Appl.011 2011

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Decisão judicial
Palavras-Chave
  • Reparações / Remédios
Resumo do Caso
This is an Application for compensation and reparations pursuant to the Court's judgment of 14 June 2013 on Consolidated Applications Nos. 009/2011 and 011/2011. In the instant Application, the Court held that the Applicant's claims for pecuniary damages and legal costs were not proved and therefore, dismissed.
Estado
  • Tanzânia
Direitos Violados
  • Não indicado
Country Geolocation
Tanzania: 6° 22′ 9″ S, 34° 53′ 20″ E
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

004/2011 – Comissão Africana dos Direitos do Homem e dos Povos c. Grande Jamahiriya Árabe Líbia Popular e Socialista (Ordem)

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Ordem
Palavras-Chave
  • Violação grave e massiva dos direitos humanos
Resumo do Caso
This is an application against the Great Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya (Libya) alleging serious and massive human Rights violations guaranteed under the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights
Estado
  • Líbia
Country Geolocation
Libya: 32° 33′ 21″ N, 13° 16′ 48″ E
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

003/2015 – Kennedy Owino Onyachi e Charles John Mwanini Njoka c. Tanzânia

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Acórdão
Palavras-Chave
  • Direito de Ser Ouvido
  • Extradição
  • Leis domésticas
  • Prisão e Detenção Arbitrárias
  • Prisão Falsa
Resumo do Caso
TheApplicants,Mr.KennedyOwinoOnyachiandMr.CharlesJohnMwanikiNjoka,arecitizensof theRepublicofKenya.Theyareconvictedprisonerswhoarecurrentlyservinga sentenceof thirty(30)years'imprisonmentforthecrimeofaggravatedrobberyattheUkongaCentralPrisoninDaresSalaam,UnitedRepublicof Tanzania.
Estado
  • Tanzânia
Direitos Violados
  • CADHP 6 : Direito à Liberdade Pessoal e Proteção contra Detenção Arbitrária
  • CADHP 7.1 : Direito de Ser Ouvido
  • CADHP 7.1.c: Direito à Defesa
  • CADHP1 - Obrigações dos Estados Partes
Country Geolocation
Tanzania: 6° 22′ 9″ S, 34° 53′ 20″ E
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

004/2023 - Moahd Kheriji Ghannouch & others v. Tunisia

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Ordem
Resumo do Caso
The Respondent State applied for a revocation order. The Respondent State's central justification was that its conduct was already in compliance with the Court's order by the time the order was issued. The Court considered that reasoning insufficient and dismissed the Respondent State's request for a revocation of the order for provisional measures from 28 August 2023 in Application 004/2023.
Estado
  • Tunísia
Country Geolocation
Tunisia: 33° 53′ 13″ N, 9° 32′ 15″ E
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

Request for Advisory Opinion No.001 2013 Socio Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) ENGLISH (2) (1)

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Opinião Consultiva
Palavras-Chave
  • amicus curiae
  • Jurisdição
  • Relação entre os Mecanismos da UA
Resumo do Caso
The request for Advisory opinion is submitted by the Socio Economic Rights and Accountability Project on the basis of clarifying whether the organization is recognized by the AU. SERAP argues it should be recognized by the African Union on the basis that is an African organization that is registered in Nigeria. SERAP also argues that due to its observer status with the African Commission it has the competence to request an opinion relating to any question within the scope of the ACFPR. But since SERAP doesn’t have a memorandum of understanding with the African union, it isn’t entitled to bring a request for advisory opinion before the court. The Court couldn’t give an opinion on the request due to not having personal jurisdiction.
Estado
  • Nigéria
Country Geolocation
Nigeria: 9° 4′ 55″ N, 8° 40′ 31″ E
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

016 2016 Diocles William v United Republic of Tanzania

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Acórdão
Palavras-Chave
  • Direito à Igualdade perante a Lei
  • Direito de Ser Ouvido
  • Estupro
Resumo do Caso
The record before the Court indicates that on 11 July 2010, at around 16:00hours, at Mbale Village, Missenyi District in Kagera Region, the Applicant who was twenty-two (22) years old at the time, allegedly raped a minor aged twelve (12) years.
Estado
  • Tanzânia
Direitos Violados
  • CADHP 7 : Direito ao Julgamento Justo
  • CADHP 7.1.c: Direito à Defesa
Country Geolocation
Tanzania: 6° 22′ 9″ S, 34° 53′ 20″ E
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

ECW/CCJ/JUD/22/26 - The Incorporated Trustees of Okpamakhin Community Initiative and seven others v Federal republic of Nigeria

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Acórdão
Palavras-Chave
  • Direito à Informação
  • Direito à Propriedade
Resumo do Caso
The Incorporated Trustees of Okpamakhin Community Initiative and seven others, acting on behalf of farming communities in Edo State, Nigeria, alleged that the Government unlawfully reallocated parts of the Owan Forest Zone to private investors for plantation projects, threatening their customary land rights, livelihoods, cultural heritage, and environmental interests. They further claimed that the Government failed to disclose information concerning the identity of investors and agreements relating to the forest allocation, thereby violating their right to receive information. The ECOWAS Court held that while the Applicants demonstrated a recognizable customary interest in the forest land, they failed to establish actual or imminent interference with their property rights or prove that the Government unlawfully denied access to information. Consequently, the Court found no violation of Articles 14 and 9 of the African Charter, dismissed all reliefs sought, and ordered each party to bear its own costs.
Estado
  • Nigéria
Resultado
Decidiu sobre os Méritos
Data da Decisão
18 de mai. de 2026
Country Geolocation
Nigeria: 9° 4′ 55″ N, 8° 40′ 31″ E
Tribunal da CEDEAO

013 2017 Sébastien Germain Ajavon v Republic of Benin

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Acórdão
Palavras-Chave
  • Direito à Igualdade perante a Lei
  • Direito à Propriedade
  • Direito ao Julgamento Justo
  • Direito de Ser Ouvido
  • Independência Judicial
Resumo do Caso
The Gendarmerie (para-military force) of the Autonomous Port of Cotonou and the Benin Customs Department received warnings from the Intelligence and Documentation Services at the Office of the President of the Republic about the presence of a huge quantity of cocaine in a container of frozen goods imported by the company-Comptoir Mondialde Neqoce (COMON SA) of which the Applicant is the Chief Executive Officer. Based on this information, a judicial inquiry was, on 28 October2016, instituted against the Applicant and three of his employees for the trafficking of eighteen (18kgs) of pure cocaine.
Estado
  • Benim
Direitos Violados
  • CADHP 14: Direito à Propriedade
  • CADHP 26 : Dever de Garantir a Independência dos Tribunais
  • CADHP 5: Punição Cruel Desumana e Desproporcional
  • CADHP 7.1.a: Direito a um Remédio em um Tribunal de Jurisdição Competente
  • CADHP 7.1.b : Inocente Até Encontrado Culpado
  • CADHP 7.1.c: Direito à Defesa
Country Geolocation
Benin: 9° 18′ 28″ N, 2° 18′ 57″ E
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

013 2017 Sébastien Germain Ajavon v Republic of Benin (Order for provisional mesures (7 December 2018))

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Order for Provisional Measures
Palavras-Chave
  • Direito à Igualdade perante a Lei
  • Direito à Propriedade
  • Direito ao Julgamento Justo
  • Direito de Ser Ouvido
  • Independência Judicial
Resumo do Caso
The Gendarmerie (para-military force) of the Autonomous Port of Cotonou and the Benin Customs Department received warnings from the Intelligence and Documentation Services at the Office of the President of the Republic about the presence of a huge quantity of cocaine in a container of frozen goods imported by the company-Comptoir Mondialde Neqoce (COMON SA) of which the Applicant is the Chief Executive Officer. Based on this information, a judicial inquiry was, on 28 October2016, instituted against the Applicant and three of his employees for the trafficking of eighteen (18kgs) of pure cocaine.
Estado
  • Benim
Direitos Violados
  • CADHP 14: Direito à Propriedade
  • CADHP 26 : Dever de Garantir a Independência dos Tribunais
  • CADHP 5: Punição Cruel Desumana e Desproporcional
  • CADHP 7.1.a: Direito a um Remédio em um Tribunal de Jurisdição Competente
  • CADHP 7.1.b : Inocente Até Encontrado Culpado
  • CADHP 7.1.c: Direito à Defesa
Country Geolocation
Benin: 9° 18′ 28″ N, 2° 18′ 57″ E
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

013 2017 Sébastien Germain Ajavon v Republic of Benin (Dissenting Opinion of Justice Chafika Bensaoula (March 2019))

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Opinião Dissidente
Palavras-Chave
  • Direito à Igualdade perante a Lei
  • Direito à Propriedade
  • Direito ao Julgamento Justo
  • Direito de Ser Ouvido
  • Independência Judicial
Resumo do Caso
The Gendarmerie (para-military force) of the Autonomous Port of Cotonou and the Benin Customs Department received warnings from the Intelligence and Documentation Services at the Office of the President of the Republic about the presence of a huge quantity of cocaine in a container of frozen goods imported by the company-Comptoir Mondialde Neqoce (COMON SA) of which the Applicant is the Chief Executive Officer. Based on this information, a judicial inquiry was, on 28 October2016, instituted against the Applicant and three of his employees for the trafficking of eighteen (18kgs) of pure cocaine.
Estado
  • Benim
Direitos Violados
  • CADHP 14: Direito à Propriedade
  • CADHP 26 : Dever de Garantir a Independência dos Tribunais
  • CADHP 5: Punição Cruel Desumana e Desproporcional
  • CADHP 7.1.a: Direito a um Remédio em um Tribunal de Jurisdição Competente
  • CADHP 7.1.b : Inocente Até Encontrado Culpado
  • CADHP 7.1.c: Direito à Defesa
Country Geolocation
Benin: 9° 18′ 28″ N, 2° 18′ 57″ E
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

013 2017 Sébastien Germain Ajavon v Republic of Benin (Separate Opinion of Judge Gerard NIYUNGEKO)

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Opinião Individual
Palavras-Chave
  • Direito à Igualdade perante a Lei
  • Direito à Propriedade
  • Direito ao Julgamento Justo
  • Direito de Ser Ouvido
  • Independência Judicial
Resumo do Caso
The Gendarmerie (para-military force) of the Autonomous Port of Cotonou and the Benin Customs Department received warnings from the Intelligence and Documentation Services at the Office of the President of the Republic about the presence of a huge quantity of cocaine in a container of frozen goods imported by the company-Comptoir Mondialde Neqoce (COMON SA) of which the Applicant is the Chief Executive Officer. Based on this information, a judicial inquiry was, on 28 October2016, instituted against the Applicant and three of his employees for the trafficking of eighteen (18kgs) of pure cocaine.
Estado
  • Benim
Direitos Violados
  • CADHP 14: Direito à Propriedade
  • CADHP 26 : Dever de Garantir a Independência dos Tribunais
  • CADHP 5: Punição Cruel Desumana e Desproporcional
  • CADHP 7.1.a: Direito a um Remédio em um Tribunal de Jurisdição Competente
  • CADHP 7.1.b : Inocente Até Encontrado Culpado
  • CADHP 7.1.c: Direito à Defesa
Country Geolocation
Benin: 9° 18′ 28″ N, 2° 18′ 57″ E
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

013 2017 Sébastien Germain Ajavon v Republic of Benin (Judgment on reparations(28th November 2019))

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Acórdão
Palavras-Chave
  • Direito à Igualdade perante a Lei
  • Direito à Propriedade
  • Direito ao Julgamento Justo
  • Direito de Ser Ouvido
  • Independência Judicial
  • Reparações / Remédios
Resumo do Caso
The Gendarmerie (para-military force) of the Autonomous Port of Cotonou and the Benin Customs Department received warnings from the Intelligence and Documentation Services at the Office of the President of the Republic about the presence of a huge quantity of cocaine in a container of frozen goods imported by the company-Comptoir Mondialde Neqoce (COMON SA) of which the Applicant is the Chief Executive Officer. Based on this information, a judicial inquiry was, on 28 October2016, instituted against the Applicant and three of his employees for the trafficking of eighteen (18kgs) of pure cocaine.
Estado
  • Benim
Direitos Violados
  • CADHP 14: Direito à Propriedade
  • CADHP 26 : Dever de Garantir a Independência dos Tribunais
  • CADHP 5: Punição Cruel Desumana e Desproporcional
  • CADHP 7.1.a: Direito a um Remédio em um Tribunal de Jurisdição Competente
  • CADHP 7.1.b : Inocente Até Encontrado Culpado
  • CADHP 7.1.c: Direito à Defesa
Country Geolocation
Benin: 9° 18′ 28″ N, 2° 18′ 57″ E
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

013 2017 Sébastien Germain Ajavon v Republic of Benin (Dissenting opinion by Judge Gerard Niyungeko on Judgment on Reparation)

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Opinião Dissidente
Palavras-Chave
  • Direito à Igualdade perante a Lei
  • Direito à Propriedade
  • Direito ao Julgamento Justo
  • Direito de Ser Ouvido
  • Independência Judicial
  • Reparações / Remédios
Resumo do Caso
The Gendarmerie (para-military force) of the Autonomous Port of Cotonou and the Benin Customs Department received warnings from the Intelligence and Documentation Services at the Office of the President of the Republic about the presence of a huge quantity of cocaine in a container of frozen goods imported by the company-Comptoir Mondialde Neqoce (COMON SA) of which the Applicant is the Chief Executive Officer. Based on this information, a judicial inquiry was, on 28 October2016, instituted against the Applicant and three of his employees for the trafficking of eighteen (18kgs) of pure cocaine.
Estado
  • Benim
Direitos Violados
  • CADHP 14: Direito à Propriedade
  • CADHP 26 : Dever de Garantir a Independência dos Tribunais
  • CADHP 5: Punição Cruel Desumana e Desproporcional
  • CADHP 7.1.a: Direito a um Remédio em um Tribunal de Jurisdição Competente
  • CADHP 7.1.b : Inocente Até Encontrado Culpado
  • CADHP 7.1.c: Direito à Defesa
Country Geolocation
Benin: 9° 18′ 28″ N, 2° 18′ 57″ E
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

020 2016 Anaclet Paulo v United Republic of Tanzania

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Acórdão
Palavras-Chave
  • Direito à Igualdade perante a Lei
  • Direito ao Julgamento Justo
  • Direito de Ser Ouvido
  • Discriminação
Resumo do Caso
The file record indicates that on the night of 28 July 1997, four individuals forced their way into the home of a certain Benjamin Mhaya Simon, in the village oflzingo Nshamba; and after tying up the latter and his wife, they made away with a sum of Eight Hundred Thousand Tanzania Shillings (TZS 800,000), a radio cassette player, five trousers, two wrist watches and three pairs of loin cloth. On the same night, the Applicant and three other individuals were arrested by the Police and charged with the offence of armed robbery with violence.
Estado
  • Tanzânia
Direitos Violados
  • CADHP 7.1.c: Direito à Defesa
Country Geolocation
Tanzania: 6° 22′ 9″ S, 34° 53′ 20″ E
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

ECW/CCJ/JUD/24/25 -Solomon Ekolama & Anor. v. Nigeria

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Acórdão
Palavras-Chave
  • Admissibilidade
  • Competência do Tribunal
  • Danos e Compensação
  • Direito à Igualdade perante a Lei
  • Direito à Propriedade
  • Direitos Civis e Políticos
  • Intellectual Property
  • Jurisdição
  • Leis domésticas
  • Procedimentos dos Mecanismos Judiciais Regionais
  • Right to Information / Digital Rights
  • Roubo
  • Segurança Interna do Estado
  • Violação dos direitos humanos
Resumo do Caso
The ECOWAS Court held that although the Applicants proved ownership of their copyrighted software through a valid copyright certificate, the Respondent’s alleged copying and use of the software did not amount to a violation of the right to property under Article 14 of the African Charter, since the Applicants were not deprived of their proprietary interest. The Court found that allegations of theft fall within the realm of criminal law and lie outside the Court’s jurisdiction. The claim under Article 26 of the ICCPR for equality before the law was dismissed for lack of factual basis. Claims under the Berne Convention, WIPO treaties, and the Nigerian Constitution were found inadmissible. All human rights claims were ultimately dismissed.
Estado
  • Nigéria
Resultado
Caso Rejeitado
Data da Decisão
12 de mai. de 2025
Country Geolocation
Nigeria: 9° 4′ 55″ N, 8° 40′ 31″ E
Tribunal da CEDEAO

058/2019 - XYZ v Benin

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Decisão judicial
Palavras-Chave
  • Admissibilidade
  • Agotamento dos Remédios Internos
Resumo do Caso
The Court rules that since the present application had been commenced prior to the resolution of the matter before the domestic Constitutional Court, the Applicant cannot rely on the the domestic court's decision to justify the exhaustion of local remedies. Therefore, the application was ruled inadmissible.
Estado
  • Benim
Country Geolocation
Benin: 9° 18′ 28″ N, 2° 18′ 57″ E
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

009/2020 - XYZ v Benin

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Decisão judicial
Palavras-Chave
  • Admissibilidade
  • Agotamento dos Remédios Internos
Resumo do Caso
The Court ruled that the application was inadmissible because the Applicant did not make an effort to take the matter to the Constitutional Court of Benin prior to making an application to the African Court. Therefore, the Applicant did not exhaust local remedies.
Estado
  • Benim
Country Geolocation
Benin: 9° 18′ 28″ N, 2° 18′ 57″ E
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

014/2018 - Ajaye Jogoo v Tanzania

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Decisão judicial
Palavras-Chave
  • Admissibilidade
  • Agotamento dos Remédios Internos
Resumo do Caso
The Court ruled that the Applicant did not demonstrate that they tried to file cases in the Respondent State through a legal representative. Therefore, the Applicant failed to exhaust local remedies and the application was ruled inadmissible.
Estado
  • Tanzânia
Country Geolocation
Tanzania: 6° 22′ 9″ S, 34° 53′ 20″ E
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

Kolawole O.A. Koiki v Federal Republic of Nigeria

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Acórdão
Palavras-Chave
  • Admissibilidade
  • Direito ao Julgamento Justo
  • Direito de Ser Ouvido
  • IHRDA
  • Jurisdição
  • Reasonable Period of Time
  • Reparações / Remédios
  • Violação dos direitos humanos
Resumo do Caso
The Court found that the Respondent violated the Applicant’s right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time under Article 7(1)(d) of the African Charter. The failure to reconstitute the NHRC Governing Council for six years prevented the NHRC from completing the investigation. The Court awarded 5 million naira as compensation. Each party shall bear its own costs. Country:
Estado
  • Nigéria
Resultado
Decidiu sobre os Méritos
Data da Decisão
17 de nov. de 2025
Country Geolocation
Nigeria: 9° 4′ 55″ N, 8° 40′ 31″ E
Tribunal da CEDEAO

012/2020 - Guillaume Kigbafori Soro & Others v Cote D’Ivoire

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Decisão judicial
Palavras-Chave
  • Admissibilidade
  • Agotamento dos Remédios Internos
Resumo do Caso
The Court found that the Applicants had seized the Court prematurely, since proceedings before domestic courts were still ongoing. Therefore, local remedies were not exhausted.
Estado
  • Côte d'Ivoire
Country Geolocation
Côte d'Ivoire: 7° 32′ 24″ N, 5° 32′ 49″ W
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

ECW/CCJ/JUD/22/25 Lat Diop v. Senegal

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Acórdão
Palavras-Chave
  • Abuse of Power
  • Admissibilidade
  • Arbitrary Restriction
  • Danos e Compensação
  • Jurisdição
  • Liberdade de Movimento
  • Segurança Interna do Estado
  • Violação dos direitos humanos
Resumo do Caso
The Court affirmed its jurisdiction on human rights violation claims under Article 9(4) of the ECOWAS Protocol. The Applicant, a former minister, was prevented from boarding an international flight without formal notification or procedure. The Court found the restriction arbitrary and illegal, violating Article 12(2) of the African Charter. The Defendant failed to justify the restriction legally. The Applicant was awarded general damages of 6 million CFA Francs. The Defendant was ordered to cease restrictions and bear all court costs.
Estado
  • Senegal
Resultado
Decidiu sobre os Méritos
Data da Decisão
9 de mai. de 2025
Country Geolocation
Senegal: 14° 29′ 51″ N, 14° 27′ 9″ W
Tribunal da CEDEAO

Chief Festus A. Ogwuche & 25 Others v The Republic Of Cote D’Ivoire & 14 Others

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Decisão judicial
Palavras-Chave
  • Jurisdição
Resumo do Caso
The complaint is a response to a proposed amendment to A/P.1/7/79. The proposed amendment would incorporate the requirement of domestic remedies as a pre-requisite for admissibility to the ECOWAS Court. This particular judgment determines that not all of the states listed in the application can be parties, because the African Court does not have jurisdiction to hear complaints against them. The judgment, therefore, revises and renames the application.
Estado
  • Benim
  • Burkina Faso
  • cabo Verde
  • Côte d'Ivoire
  • Gâmbia
  • Gana
  • Guiné
  • Guiné-Bissau
  • Libéria
  • Mali
  • Níger
  • Nigéria
  • Senegal
  • Serra Leoa
  • Togo
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

006 2016 Mgosi Mwita Makungu v United Republic of Tanzania

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Acórdão
Palavras-Chave
  • Assalto à mão armada
  • Direito à Igualdade perante a Lei
  • Direito ao Julgamento Justo
  • Discriminação
Resumo do Caso
The claim arises from the Respondent State’s alleged failure to provide the Applicant with certified true copies of the records of proceedings and judgments of the Criminal Case where he was charged with the offence of robbery with violence, and convicted and sentenced to fifteen (15) years imprisonment on 15 April 1996.
Estado
  • Tanzânia
Direitos Violados
  • CADHP 7.1.a: Direito a um Remédio em um Tribunal de Jurisdição Competente
Country Geolocation
Tanzania: 6° 22′ 9″ S, 34° 53′ 20″ E
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

006 2016 Mgosi Mwita Makungu v United Republic of Tanzania lndividual Opinion of Justice Blise Tchikaya

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Opinião Individual
Palavras-Chave
  • Assalto à mão armada
  • Direito à Igualdade perante a Lei
  • Direito ao Julgamento Justo
  • Discriminação
Resumo do Caso
The claim arises from the Respondent State’s alleged failure to provide the Applicant with certified true copies of the records of proceedings and judgments of the Criminal Case where he was charged with the offence of robbery with violence, and convicted and sentenced to fifteen (15) years imprisonment on 15 April 1996.
Estado
  • Tanzânia
Direitos Violados
  • CADHP 7.1.a: Direito a um Remédio em um Tribunal de Jurisdição Competente
Country Geolocation
Tanzania: 6° 22′ 9″ S, 34° 53′ 20″ E
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

ECW/CCJ/JUD/15/26 - Centre for Community Law v. Federal Republic of Nigeria

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Acórdão
Palavras-Chave
  • Direito ao Julgamento Justo
  • Instalações / Condições de Detenção
  • Liberdade da Pessoa
Resumo do Caso
The Centre for Community Law, acting in the public interest, challenged Nigeria's systemic practice of prolonged pre-trial detention and overcrowded correctional facilities. Relying on official prison statistics, it argued that the large number of awaiting-trial inmates and poor detention conditions violated multiple human rights under the African Charter. The ECOWAS Court held that Nigeria had failed to rebut the Applicant's evidence and found that the prolonged detention of awaiting-trial inmates and overcrowded prison conditions constituted systemic human rights violations. The Court ordered Nigeria to establish mechanisms for periodic judicial review of prolonged detention cases, implement a comprehensive prison decongestion policy, adopt non-custodial measures for minor and bailable offences, and submit a compliance report within six months
Estado
  • Nigéria
Resultado
Decidiu sobre os Méritos
Data da Decisão
15 de mai. de 2026
Country Geolocation
Nigeria: 9° 4′ 55″ N, 8° 40′ 31″ E
Tribunal da CEDEAO

ECW CCJ JUD 04 18 FAJ and Others v The Gambia compressed

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Acórdão
Palavras-Chave
  • Direito à Dignidade
  • Justiça transitória
  • Liberdade de Expressão / Direitos Digitais
  • Prisão e Detenção Arbitrárias
Resumo do Caso
The case concerns crackdown on journalists during the Jahmeh era for reportage that were not favourable to the regime. All journalists concerned eventually went on exile after acquitted and released.
Estado
  • Gâmbia
Resultado
Decidiu sobre os Méritos
Data da Decisão
13 de fev. de 2018
Country Geolocation
Gambia: 13° 26′ 35″ N, 15° 18′ 37″ W
Tribunal da CEDEAO

040 2016 Mariam Kouma & Another v Republic of Mali

Preview
Tipo de Documento
  • Acórdão
Palavras-Chave
  • Administração da Justiça
  • Direito à Dignidade
  • Direito à Saúde
  • Direito ao Julgamento Justo
  • Tortura e Mal Tratamento
Resumo do Caso
The Application was filed by APDF and IHRDA on behalf of Mariam Kouma, amerchant in Bamako, and her son Ousmane Diabat6, and invokes the violation ofthe Applicants' right to a fair trial by the Respondent state.
Estado
  • Mali
Country Geolocation
Mali: 17° 34′ 14″ N, 3° 59′ 46″ W
Decisão do Tribunal Africano

30 shown of 1458 entities

30 more 300 more