41. It is now well established practice in law regarding applications for · I I ... interim measures that some factors should be considered before the grant of same. The Court ought to consider whether the reasons given in the affidavit show the situation of the applicant to be of extreme gravity and urgency, and also whether it would be necessary to avoid irreparable damage of persons by granting the interim order. As suggested in the cases referred to herein before, the Court should adopt such provisional measures as it deems pertinent in the given circumstance of each case. 42. In other Regional and International jurisdictions particular the International American Human Rights Court, Article 63 (2) states: "In cases of extreme gravity and urgency, and when necessary to avoid irreparable damage to persons, the court shall adopt such provisional measures .:, ·==c... . . as it deems pertinent in · matters it has under consideration …” In Peace Community of San Jose de Apastado Case (Colombia) the Court ordered States to adopt measures to protect specifically named persons and on special occasions it requested that a (- group of unnamed persons be protected when they are at grave risk. See Provisional Measures in the Case Law of Human Rights by Clara Burbano Herrara. Also in Suarez Roseto case (Ecuador), Loayza Tomayo Case (Peru), Gallardo Rodriguez Case (Mexico) and Cesti Hurtado case - (Peru) and reported on page 4 of the book mentioned a bove, the court ordered sometimes that some beneficiaries to regain their freedom and that newly organized trails have led to a reduction of the death penalty 16

Select target paragraph3