purposes remains the proper party to be sued for alleged human right violations by its agents. The claim on the non- exhaustion of local remedies also fails. Decision: The Court adjudicating in a public hearing after hearing the Parties in the last resort and after deliberating in accordance with law. AS TO THE PRELIMINARY OBJECTION: DECLARES that the action of the Plaintiff is admissible and hereby dismiss the Preliminary Objection. AS TO Merits: DECLARES; i. That the Defendant’s action of seizing the Plaintiffs call to Bar Certificate through its agents, the Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC) is a violation of the right to property of the Plaintiff as guaranteed by Articles 14 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Right and 17 (1) (2) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. ii. That the seizure of the Plaintiff’s call to Bar Certificate by the agents of the Defendant without regard to due process of law is a violation of the Plaintiff’s right to fair hearing as guaranteed under Article 7 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Right as well as his right to privacy guaranteed under Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 36