the Police officers at the border and their superiors made their submissions as to the fact of the case. The Plaintiff filed a response to the Defendants’ statement of defence denying the submissions therein and averred that he has over the years passed the boarders of Hillacondji to the Republic of Togo without any problem or refusal to submit himself to the border control. That he went through the border post on his way to Togo two days earlier and it is very strange to say the least that while on his way back on the 14th march 2014, he refused to submit himself to the same boarder control in the Defendants’ territory. ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION It appears from the totality of the issues raised the following questions call for determination; 1. Whether from the totality of evidence adduced in this case, the Plaintiff has established a breach of his fundamental rights as alleged. 2. Whether the Defendant has carried out effective investigation on the alleged violation of the Plaintiff’s Rights 3. Whether the Applicant is entitled to the reliefs sought. These issues will now be examined seriatim. Whether from the totality of evidence adduced in this case, the plaintiff has established a breach of his fundamental rights as alleged. 8