.. I appeal, there is an indication that the 2nd plaintiff is desirable to I appeal against his conviction and sentence to death should operate to tilt in favor of the 2nd applicant than to hold otherwise. 4. Whereas analysis of the jurisprudence on the provisional measures r . · ! lI indicates that in cases of extreme gravity and urgency, and when necessary to avoid irreparable damage to persons, the court shall II adopt such provisional measures as it deems pertinent in a matter of this nature. I ' I nd 5. Whereas a conviction and sentence hanging on the 2 plaintiff when his intention to appeal against the conviction and sentence is in the Court's estimation is of extreme gravity and urgency and to avo.id irreparable damage to the 2nd plaintiff, the Court shall grant he. interim measure/injunction by ordering that the defendants shall suspend the death sentence until th e c a s e b e f o r e the Court is determined. -' "" ' --I I I 6. Whereas an application as in this case for alleged violation of human rights under Article 9 (4) of the Supplementary Protocol i? within the jurisdiction of this court and does not amount to an -- appeal from the decision of the National Court albeit the Robbery and Firearms Tribunal of Nigeria and the jurisprudence of this court is long settled by plethora of judicial decisions evidenced by the authorities of K.eita v Mali supra and Alimu Akeem supra. 22 I ..