xi. apply the principle of proportionality in assessing the compensation to be granted to him; xii. order the Respondent State to guarantee the non-repetition of the aforesaid violations and accordingly report to the Court every six months until the full implementation of the Orders; xiii. order the Respondent State to publish the Court's judgment in the Government Gazette within one month of delivery thereof as a measure of satisfaction. 18. The Respondent State, for its part, prays the Court to: declare that the Application has not invoked the Court's jurisdiction and should therefore be dismissed; declare that the stipulated under Application Rules has not met the admissibility conditions 40(5) and (6) of the Rules and should consequently be declared inadmissible, and duly dismissed; iii. find that it has not violated Articles 3, 7(1)(c) and (d) and 7(2) of the Charter and the Application should therefore be dismissed; rule that the Applicant’s prayer for release should be denied on the ground that it is s contemptuous of the judgment of the Court of Appeal; dismiss with costs the Applicant’s claim for reparations in its entirety ; issue such other order as it may deem appropriate and fair. Vv. JURISDICTION 19. The Court notes that Article 3 of the Protocol provides as follows: 1, The jurisdiction of the Court shall extend to all cases and disputes submitted to it concerning the interpretation and application of the Charter, this Protocol and any other relevant Human Rights instrument ratified by the States concerned.