ACHPR African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights Human Rights our Collective Responsibility r 15. On 27 April 2005, the Complainant I filed another formal request for Provisional Measures seeking the release of the Victim from Prison custody pending the determination of fuiscase. tt 16. In compliance with Article 57 of I African Charter, notice of the Complaint and the request for Provisfonal Measures, along with a copy thereof, was communicated to the Resiondent State on 5 May 2005. 17. On 8 May 2005, the Respondent State filed its preliminary submissions on the Complainant's request for Provisiohal Measures. The Respondent State filed further arguments in objection of the est for Provisional Measures on 1 June 2005. ~:~~. .i;</ 18. After hearing the oral arg_u~ents. of t~~/~:~w~la f~~~l;~~it~$~7"l~i_~;:~~? the Respondent State's Submissions In r~spect:;Q£~t~ereql;l~st Ior :Rr<2¥,lsIOnal Measures, the Commission declineg;x('t requ~~t~i vie~:iiQitthefact that the request had been overtaken by ~)r.e~ts. ·;'t·;r,:,·~:·~~·(' c ,: .(\'"., f };:..,:,&i: t\:!~ ',<'.~:" <~;/ 19. On 18 August 2005, the S~.cretari~f:f\v,rotet th Parties to inform them :a~i!e ;~!=~:C\~~~~~~~~:~~lhe ~~~ :: r~~~::~ the Complaman~,19J0i1-Y;~dIts~~y?nuslslbn:S,~:,,~p?-':'AdrmsslbIllty. Y" 1. 1/ ,'" ~. ./ e ,,r 20. Between 18 Au'g.ust 2005 and 3 Noyel!lber 2006, letters were exchanged between the Se~~~tariatand the ~arti'e~:~clQncerning the submission of their respective argurit~~~~on the Ad~issi1Jility of the Communication. During the 39~".~rdinar:l;f~~~~~tonof /~~~ C9mmission held in May 2006, the Resp~TI.;.4..~~t: :.?tate s~b~~~~~~:l;~tsarg~ment on the Merits although no Subrmss~9~s,o~·.Adrmsslblhtyhad bee~ made . • , ,""" ',.,. I 21. On 25 No~em:ber 200q)the Complainant's argument on Admissibility was received at the Secretariat and receipf acknowledged by a letter dated 8 December 200~:;, ..' I 22. Between May 2007 and December 12011, several other letters were exchanged between the Secretariat I and the Parties concerning the Respondent State's Submissions on Admissibility. The Secretariat also I communicated with the Parties on the need for submission of legible copies of all relevant national decisiohs and judgments by both parties. Copies of relevant national decisions and judgments in legible format-~ were finally received from the Complainant on 22 April 2008. _~\J1~ARNN 4tvD,o s. ~ 0'- ~ c,R£. 23. On 23 January 2012, the Secretariat received a Note Verba, mat . ~ January 2012 from the Respondent State submitting the R~~on e t. ,,:,)~ r I /4)" <\ 'Co.. 0.0'" <'~ . q. ""<C: <p. \ ~ I I "'-.~' l i ~/ \ -~ ~ ~~~t'li~. IJ' ...\, c.-5'/0'tv 4"RICP.\~ ~'V,_v~,,' ji 't' ' ~.~ ~..OMME E1. D.£.s ........ ~~ ' ~ ~":J I ~ C,