A R African Commission on Human and Peoples' Righ~s Human Rights our Collective Responsibility Charleswood farm, Chimanimani owned by the Victim. The Respondent State avers that Viola N ha~ alleged that she was raped at the farm by one Chamunorwa Muusha, the matter was investigated by the police under the Criminal Investigations I Mutare and the crime docket referred to the Attorney General' s ~ ...... ~'-'I 139. In respect of the alleged cases of , the Respondent State submits that it is only aware of the murder of IManyenyekwa of the same farm. It submits that the police are yet to finalise investigations hence, the alleged case of murder is still pending. The 1<o" ......"." State avers that progress in bringing these cases to finality is impeded the fact the accused and witnesses, including the Victim could not 140. With regards to the miscarriage s the alleged actions of ZANU PF sup knowledge of such incident, and cOllte:m:(i:IJl;k comprehensive facts pertaining to Jtte investigated, and would have b~en:{~Jna allegations raised. ;. 141. The Respondent ~f~t~ '~;: : were clearly not State agents, as the ~~gpdl:J,~", ", and wooden clubs, are a clear indicatioI1fi!l1atthey'were "'Hf';,I..;'~,,, • Therefore, it contends that since the violations i~pmplained of sanctioned by the State but were actions of opportuni~~iE criminals who to():J,<[,'aavantage of the situation, liability can thus not be attrib] >'/ to the State.'~)i ":, Alleged vior~t*:Qn:of Artie \.~\,:~) -':~.<\~ <:,!~!l.; < /;,/. il: ,'Yo£,;,the+African ·"~~\i;~1i:g.~'~ttEt3j:~;;" ..<,( -:/,',::;: by the Complainant as it 142. The R~~pogaenj::;~JFl:~Y' denies all ~~-r-'-h~ relates to 'the':'allege'~;j:tihlawful and y arrest of the Victim on 9 of access to legal representation. October 2002i"and the subsequent

Select target paragraph3