ACH African Commission on Human and Peoples' Hights come within the competence of the that rights recognized by the African Human Rights our Collective Responsibility tion can be accommodated on the grounds that it alleges have been violated.l? 61. In the present Communication, the Complainant alleges that rights guaranteed by the African Charter ha been violated by the Respondent State. The Complainant goes further list the provisions of the Charter that have allegedly· been violated even though there is no obligation on a Complainant to mention specific of the Charter that have been violated.l! Accordingly, the met the requirement to show a prima 62. The Commission further notes Communication do not contradict the nrmcrmesser Act. The Communication also meets personae competence of the alleged violation of rights in competent entity against a with its established Communication African Charter. respon '" means wi'~it;f~~ alleged to n:~v.ebeen '" '~", 64. The commisJi9Ur)has previously held remedies does not apply where ineffective"14 or where they are" is therefore firm! y established in the i ' the Respondent State inadmissible because the local remedies. Article 56(5) "sent after exhausting local that this procedure is unduly on the principle that "the ty to redress by its own domestic legal system, the wrong t the requirement to exhaust local remedies are "unavailable or and unreasonably prolcnged=.vlt of the Commission that