r,f"�) ACH PR ' (nm.:i� ,. i ,., African Comm1ss1on on Human and Peoples' Rights Human Rights our Coilective Responsibility f. Prescribe to the Respondent State to grant the Victim the equivalent of fifty million U.S. dollars ($50,000,000.00) as compensation to the Victim and his Children for all the harm they endured. Procedure: 11. The Secretariat received the Complaint on 1 October 2015, and acknowledged receipt on 7 October 2015. 12. On 9 October 2015, the Secretariat requested the Complainants to furnish additional information in accordance with Rule 93 (4) of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission. 13. The Secretariat received the requested information on 15 October 2015, and acknowledged receipt of the same on 21 October 2015. 14. At its 57th Ordinary Session, done in Banjul, The Gambia, from 4 to 18 November 2015, the Commission considered the Complaint and decided to be seized thereof and also issued Provisional Measures. 15. By letter and Note Verbal dated 10 November 2015, the Secretariat informed the parties of the decision on seizure and the Provisional Measures issued, and requested the Complainants to submit evidence and arguments on admissibility within two (2) months of the notification thereof, in accordance with rule 105(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission. 16. To date, the Complainants have not submitted evidences and arguments on admissibility. Accordingly, the Commission decided to strike out the Communication for want of diligent prosecution during its 74 th Ordinary Session. Analysis of the Commission on Strike Out: 17. Rule 105(1) of the Commission's Rule of Procedure (2010) provides that when the Commission is seized of a Complaint, it shall request the Complainant to present evidence and arguments on the admissibility of the Communication within two (2) months. 18. Rule 113 provides that when a deadline is fixed for a particular submission, either party may apply to the Commission for extension of the period stipulated. The Commission may grant an extension of time for a period not longer than one (1) month. 19. In the present Communication, the Complainants were requested to present evidence and arguments on the admissibility of the Communication within b��-�==H ::: u M�tv..... 4 4 1?, ;1-o� tl �@ (2) months from the date of notification of the seizure decision. This 4 expired on 10 January 2016. However, the Complainants did not pr �"ht �� RET 3IPage