. .. ,. stated that he verified the governor's statement and found i - i them to be false. He admitted not discussing with the Governor, as he did not consider it necessary 87. The 1st and 2nd defendants called no witnesses, while the 3rd to 5th defendants called one witness. 88. DW1 states that he is the Special Adviser to the Governor of Rivers State on Waterfront Development. He based his evidence on the video clip tendered by PWS, as well as the briefing he got from field staff. He stated that the video clip did not show that any of the plaintiffs suffered injuries at the hands of the defendants. He tendered the master plan of the Urban Renewal Project of the waterfronts and maintains that. it is the Federal Government that controls the police and military in Nigeria. Under cross-exan1ination, he admitted that the protest was peaceful and, as such, there was no need to call for security reinforcement. 89. It is trite that an evidence that is uncontroverted is taken as admitted. The staten1ents made by the plaintiffs' witnesses, which were not in any way challenged by the Defendant, the Federal Republic of Nigeria, provide this Court with enough