AC PR African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights Human Rights our Collective Responsibility was outside the limits of its powers. As such, the SCA set aside the trial court's decision.? The Complainants' further appe.3.l to the Constitutional Court was I unsuccessful.' , 12. The Complainants claim that their continued illegal occupation of the Property is due to the Municipality's failure to pr~vide adequate housing in line with the government's basic obligations under the South African Constitution and housing legislation. Articles alleged to have been violated / <,"::',' 2 ::.::~~ \ 13. The Complainants allege that the Re ponden{"State, \b,}\ failing to provide adequate housing for the 76 families repres~~i~ct:11:l'this ¢~se, has violated the provisions of Articles 5, 17, 18, 19, 22 an ' e )X!~~ic~:ti&h.Ft10t~!- ',<~<,::":c::.:2~::_')? Prayers of the Complainants 14. The Complainants: r ~(~>\ , (a) "~'~ ;"t:>,", "\}".; , " prayed that the, ~ommissioI1:;1:;~' ers th ,;,:'~Qmmunication to the African Court for adjy:4itc,ttion; and )i;:~~~,~ "<1~, ',' <' >':' ,,' :)V '<((;~h (b) req~e~t}~::;l~~E:!?isst~~},~~::~~keloi~~'~S~,~~lssions to the Commission dUrIn,g;ilts46th Ordmary<S,esslOn, sche~~Ied for 11 - 25 November 2009, in Banj-qJ! The Gambia, ibr-,,~~~ feferrar' of the Communication to the African \", " 15. Th,..~", Complain «;",;~ having elecft~d" at the admissibility stage that the C6~i~~~on adjti'a~e.l;t~S~~~er th:i~t~tt~r'lthe pra~er for referral of the Complaint to th,~~c.~Ut;t;- has bee11::'~i;g~~~; , d withr What IS left of the substance of the complaintbefore, the Co ission is for a determination of the question of whether~\the.ies'p,~~,¢e"-Tlt,,Statehas violJted the provisions of Articles 5, 17, 18, 19,22 ana.'24,·of the'Afri,can Charter in relation to them. .>' \ ,,~' Procedure . "