38. The question is whether the relief sought in this case by the Applicant/plaintiff had been justified. Taking the first issue for determination, the review of what the learned counsel submitted becomes necessary in this case. The 1st defendant relied on Section 29(4) of CFRN, 1999 (as amended) which recognizes every married woman as of full age also, that decisions of the High Court lie on appeal to the Court of Appeal of Nigeria. The 2nd defendant, relying on the case of Joseph Ibidapo v Lufthansa Airlines (1997) 4 SCNJ Pg l at pg 3, stated that in view of the decision of the above case, no law exists, which prohibits passing of death sentences on either adults or young persons and also relied on the case of Joseph Amoshima v The State (2011) 6 SCNJ Pg 245 at 247 where the court held: 'Whereas in very many jurisdictions the death sentence is frowned upon or even abolished. In Nigeria, it is fairly enshrined in our statutes'. 38. He therefore, urged the Court to hold that death sentence is constitutionally and statutorily recognized and permitted in Nigeria and that the fundamental rights as provided in Chapter IV of the 1999 Constitution of Federal Republic of Nigeria as amended were dully observed by the trial court bearing in mind that, the offence of culpable homicide was contrary to Section 221 of the Penal Code which carried a death sentence. The 3rd defendant relied on the case of Mousa Leo Keita v The State of Mali (2009) 1 CCJLR (PT2) 58 where this Court held that it is not a Court –of Appeal decisions of national courts of Member States. Also, that it did not possess the power to revise decisions made by the domestic courts of member States; hence it was powerless and cannot adjudicate upon decisions of national courts. It therefore submitted that the jurisdiction of the Community Court does not extend to appeals from decisions of domestic courts of member States. 39. However, the plaintiff contended that the sentence of death passed on the Applicant/plaintiff is a violation of her human rights pursuance of Article 7(c) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights and that the trial judge having even observed that her counsel did not effectively defend her nor represented her during the trial. He also referred to Article 4 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples ' Rights and Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which are laws that both protect the right to life and provide that no one may be arbitrarily deprived of this right. He further referred to Article N. l 0 of the Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Fair Trial and Legal Assistance in Africa to justify his stance. 12