violation of the above referred instruments and award compensation for the harm caused. 4. Procedure On June 14th, 2018, the Applicant filed a motion for expedited procedure seeking expedited hearing of the suit On the same 14th June, 2018, the Applicant also filed another motion for Provisional Measure seeking an Order of the Court granting an interim measure suspending the operation of the letter of warning/ watch list dated the 20th day of March 2018 issued by the Respondent against the Applicant On the 14th day of August, 2018, the Respondent filed a motion before the Court seeking extension of time within which to file its Preliminary Objection and Statement of Defence On 13th May, 2019, the Applicant filed a motion to amend his Application On the 3rd of February 2020, the Respondent filed a notion to amend its own defence accordingly and attached same. On the 23rd of February 2020 the Applicant filed its reply to the defence of the Respondent. 5. In addressing this application, The Court having granted leave for the Applicant to amend its application, will rely on the amended claims as well as amended defence of the Respondent. 6. Statement of facts of the Applicant. The Applicant, a Judicial officer brought this action against the Respondent alleging a violation of his right to fair hearing, degrading treatment and the destruction of his integrity before all right meaning members of the society, total humiliation of him in the eyes of his family and extended family and the whole world and total destruction of his emotional wellbeing. 7. The Applicant averred that he was appointed a Magistrate in 1989 and subsequently elevated to a Judge of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria on the 17th day of September, 1998. The issue that gave rise to the present action emanated from a judgment he delivered in a case of BILL CONSTRUCTION NIGERIA LIMITED v. GAZI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED Suit No FCT/HC/CV/219/96 in respect of one Plot 505/MISC/319 Cadastral Zone A2, Wuse, Abuja. At the end of the adjudication, judgment was delivered 3