Trié par

Date ajoutée

28 Connexions, 17 Entités

10 de 28 hubs

Sélectionner le paragraphe cible3

● ● ●

Uwazi est développé par
African Human Rights CLA 2.0
Bibliothèque
Connexion

Info
28Relations

ECW/CCJ/JUD/23/18 - Financial Investment & Development Corporation (FIDC) v Liberia

Cour de justice de la CEDEAO

Astuces de recherche

Recherche de texte

Rechercher Description du texte

Table des matières

SUMMARY OF FACTS2
WHETHER FROM THE TOTALITY OF FACTS PUT FORWARD, THIS COURT HAS THE JURISDICTION TO ENTERTAIN THIS SUIT AS CONSTITUTED AND CONCEIVED6
DECISION:13
DECLARES13
AS TO COSTS13

ECW/CCJ/JUD/23/18 - Financial Investment & Development Corporation (FIDC) v Liberia

Cour de justice de la CEDEAO

Aperçu

ECCJ App no.: ECW/CCJ/APP/08/15

ECCJ Jud No.: ECW/CCJ/JUD/23/18

Type de document

Jugement

Mots clés

Droit à la propriété
Droit à un procès équitable

Résumé de l'affaire: The Applicants have filed this suit for a violation of their rights to fair hearing and their rights to property by the Respondent.

État

Libéria

Conclusion: Déclaré irrecevable

Année de la décision: 4 juil. 2018

Droits de la Charte africaine allégués

CADHP 14: Droit à la propriété
CADHP 7 : Droit à un procès équitable

Durée de la procédure: ~ 4 juil. 2018

Géolocalisation du pays

Latitude: 6.428055

Longitude: -9.429499000000002

Géolocalisation du pays (Lié Cour de justice de la CEDEAO): Liberia

Documents principaux

ECW_CCJ_JUD_23_18 Financial Investment & Development Corporation (FIDC) v Liberia.pdf
English
Télécharger Vue

PROTOCOLE ADDITIONNEL (A/SP.1/01/05) PORTANT AMENDEMENT DU PRÉAMBULE, DES ARTICLES 1ER, 2, 9, 22 ET 30 DU PROTOCOLE A/P1/7/91 RELATIF À LA COUR DE JUSTICE DE LA COMMUNAUTÉ, AINSI QUE DE L’ARTICLE 4 PARAGRAPHE 1 DE LA VERSION ANGLAISE DUDIT PROTOCOLE

3. Any action by or against a Community Institution or any Member of the Community shall be statute barred after three (3) years from the date when the right of action arose.

Treaty

Règlement Intérieur de la Cour de Justice de la CEDEAO

2. The Court may at any time of its own motion consider whether there exists any absolute bar to proceeding with a case or declare, after hearing the parties, that the action has become devoid of purpose and that there is no need to adjudicate on it; it shall give its decision in accordance with Article 87(4) and (5) of these Rules.

Règlement intérieur

Règlement Intérieur de la Cour de Justice de la CEDEAO

2. No new plea in law may be introduced in the course of proceedings unless it is based on matters of law or of fact which come to light in the course of the procedure. 3. If in the course of the procedure one of the parties puts forward a new plea in law which is so based, the President may, even after the expiry of the normal procedural time- limits, acting on a report of the Judge - Rappoteur and after hearing the parties, allow the other party time to answer on that plea.

Règlement intérieur

PROTOCOLE ADDITIONNEL (A/SP.1/01/05) PORTANT AMENDEMENT DU PRÉAMBULE, DES ARTICLES 1ER, 2, 9, 22 ET 30 DU PROTOCOLE A/P1/7/91 RELATIF À LA COUR DE JUSTICE DE LA COMMUNAUTÉ, AINSI QUE DE L’ARTICLE 4 PARAGRAPHE 1 DE LA VERSION ANGLAISE DUDIT PROTOCOLE

4. The Court has jurisdiction to determine case of violation of human rights that occur in any Member State.

Treaty

Charte Africaine des Droits de l'Homme et des Peuples (Charte de Banjul)

Article 71.Every individual shall have the right to have his cause heard. This comprises: (a) the right to an appeal to competent national organs against acts of violating his fundamental rights as recognized and guaranteed by conventions, laws, regulations and customs in force; (b) the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty by a competent court or tribunal; (c) the right to defense, including the right to be defended by counsel of his choice; (d) the right to be tried within a reasonable time by an impartial court or tribunal. 2.No one may be condemned for an act or omission which did not constitute a legally punishable offence at the time it was committed. No penalty may be inflicted for an offence for which no provision was made at the time it was committed. Punishment is personal and can be imposed only on the offender.

Treaty

Charte Africaine des Droits de l'Homme et des Peuples (Charte de Banjul)

Article 14The right to property shall be guaranteed. It may only be encroached upon in the interest of public need or in the general interest of the community and in accordance with the provisions of appropriate laws.

Treaty

Charte Africaine des Droits de l'Homme et des Peuples (Charte de Banjul)

Treaty

Charte Africaine des Droits de l'Homme et des Peuples (Charte de Banjul)

Treaty

Charte Africaine des Droits de l'Homme et des Peuples (Charte de Banjul)

Treaty

ECW/CCJ/JUD/03/07 Moussa Léo Kéita v. Mali

Cour de justice de la CEDEAO

ECW/CCJ/JUG/04/09 - Amouzou Henri & 5 Autres c. Côte d’Ivoire

Cour de justice de la CEDEAO

Pacte International relatif aux Droits Civils et Politiques

Article 141. All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the determination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law. The press and the public may be excluded from all or part of a trial for reasons of morals, public order (ordre public) or national security in a democratic society, or when the interest of the private lives of the parties so requires, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice; but any judgement rendered in a criminal case or in a suit at law shall be made public except where the interest of juvenile persons otherwise requires or the proceedings concern matrimonial disputes or the guardianship of children. 2. Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall have the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law. 3. In the determination of any criminal charge against him, everyone shall be entitled to the following minimum guarantees, in full equality: (a) To be informed promptly and in detail in a language which he understands of the nature and cause of the charge against him; (b) To have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence and to communicate with counsel of his own choosing; (c) To be tried without undue delay; (d) To be tried in his presence, and to defend himself in person or through legalassistance of his own choosing; to be informed, if he does not have legal assistance, of this right; and to have legal assistance assigned to him, in any case where the interests of justice so require, and without payment by him in any such case if he does not have sufficient means to pay for it; (e) To examine, or have examined, the witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him; (f) To have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court; (g) Not to be compelled to testify against himself or to confess guilt. 4. In the case of juvenile persons, the procedure shall be such as will take account of their age and the desirability of promoting their rehabilitation. 5. Everyone convicted of a crime shall have the right to his conviction and sentence being reviewed by a higher tribunal according to law. 6. When a person has by a final decision been convicted of a criminal offence and when subsequently his conviction has been reversed or he has been pardoned on the ground that a new or newly discovered fact shows conclusively that there has been a miscarriage of justice, the person whohas suffered punishment as a result of such conviction shall be compensated according to law, unless it is proved that the non-disclosure of the unknown fact in time is wholly or partly attributable to him. 7. No one shall be liable to be tried or punished again for an offence for which he has already been finally convicted or acquitted in accordance with the law and penal procedure of each country

Document de l'ONU

Charte Africaine des Droits de l'Homme et des Peuples (Charte de Banjul)

Treaty

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)

Article 10 Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

Document de l'ONU

Charte Africaine des Droits de l'Homme et des Peuples (Charte de Banjul)

Treaty

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)

Document de l'ONU

ECW/CCJ/JUD/08/13 Assima Kokou Innocent, Azanlekpo Dossey K. Narcisse & Da-Silveira Hertnes & 5 Ors v. Togo

59. TheCourt insists onthe fact that before itconcludes onthe issue of occurrence of human rights violation,the concrete proofof the facts upon which theApplicants basetheir claims must beestablished witha high degreeofcertainty,oratleast,there must bea high possibilityof the claims appearing to be true, upon scrutiny.In this regard, mere allegationsdo not suffice to elicit the conviction of the Court.Nevertheless, asregards the allegations of torturelevelledagainst the'· authoritiesresponsible for investigationand·the prison administration,the Court considers whether 'realopportunities existed for theApplicants to obtain proofs of evidence. Finding themselves in a-vulnerable situation,itcanreasonablybepresumedthat realdifficulties existed for theApplicants to gather evidence ontheappallingactsthey were subjected to,suchthat theburden ofproof shallbeshifted tothe Republic ofTogo,to prove that there were no actsof tortureor actssimilartotorture.

Cour de justice de la CEDEAO

Mayanga (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community v. Nicaragua

144. “Property” can be defined as those material things which can be possessed, as well as any right which may be part of a person’s patrimony; that concept includes all movables and immovables, corporeal and incorporeal elements and any other intangible object capable of having value.5

Inter-American Court/Commission Documents

ECW/CCJ/JUD/03/07 Moussa Léo Kéita v. Mali

Cour de justice de la CEDEAO

ECW/CCJ/JUD/10/12 - Sikiru Alade c. Nigeria

Cour de justice de la CEDEAO

ECW/CCJ/JUD/03/07 Moussa Léo Kéita v. Mali

Cour de justice de la CEDEAO

ECW/CCJ/JUD/06/12 Madame Amengavi Isabelle Manavi v Republic of Togo (Application for Revision)

Cour de justice de la CEDEAO

ECW/CCJ/JUD/18/12 SERAP v Nigeria

Cour de justice de la CEDEAO

ECW/CCJ/JUG/09/12 Valentine Ayika v. Liberia

Cour de justice de la CEDEAO

ECW/CCJ/JUD/05/09 National Co-ordinating Group of Departmental Representatives of the Cocoa-Coffee Sector (CNDD) v Côte d'Ivoire

19. Consequently, in the absence of contrary evidence, the Court considers the indications contained in theApplication as evidence establishing the proof of existence of the National Co-ordinating Group ofDepartmental Representatives of the Cocoa-Coffee Sector as an association created in accordance withthe law of Côte d'Ivoire and having a legal status. The objection regarding defect in the Applicant's legalstatus therefore fails.

Cour de justice de la CEDEAO

ECW/CCJ/JUD/07/10 Registered Trustees of the Socio-Economic and Accountability Project (SERAP) v Nigeria & anor

Cour de justice de la CEDEAO

Aucune étiquettes1
- Cour de justice de la CEDEAO1
Treaties and softlaw only14
- Treaty9
- Règlement intérieur2
- Document de l'ONU3
Affaires/décisions internationales12
- Cour de justice de la CEDEAO11
- Inter-American Court/Commission Documents1
Geolocation1
- Pays (Géolocalisation)1

Create Reference

Sélectionner le type de relation

Treaties and softlaw only
International cases/decisions
Municipal law
Municipal court decision
Country
Rights Not Violated
Keywords
Outcome
Rights Alleged to be Violated
Rights Violated
Type of Document
Right Not Violated
SADC Treaty Rights Violated
SADC Treaty Rights Not Violated
ACHPR Rights Violated
ACHPR Rights Not Violated
ACHPR Provisions
Cases Referenced
Location

Astuces de recherche

Vue

Ajouter des entités / documents

Astuces de recherche