court. The Applicant did not also indicate that the Nigerian authorities refused to implement the decisions made by the judge at the High Court. Equally, he brought forth no new complaint or new application that may be entertained by the Honorable Court. The Court cannot retry a case on which a judgment of the domestic court of a Member State has already been delivered and against which no contestation has been raised. Consequently, the Court declares that the Application brought by Mr. Aliyu Tasheku is inadmissible. DECISION For These Reasons, 20. The Court, Adjudicating publicly, after hearing both Parties, and after deliberating towards this ruling, - Adjudges that the Court has jurisdiction to adjudicate on the case; - Adjudges that in the instant case, the Application brought by Mr. Aliyu Tasheku is essentially the same as the one already decided upon by the Nigerian court; - Adjudges, consequently, that the Application is inadmissible. COSTS 21. In compliance with Article 66, paragraph 11 of the Rules of the Court, each Party shall bear its costs. Thus made, declared and pronounced in English, the language of proceedings, at a public hearing at Abuja, by the Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West African States, on the day, month and year stated above. 8