compatible with the Constitutive Act of the African Union and the Charter, and therefore finds that it meets the requirement of Rule 50(2)(b) of the Rules. iii. On the requirement relating to the use of disparaging or insulting language 41. The Court further notes that the Application does not contain any language that is disparaging or insulting to the Respondent State, its institutions or the African Union, as required under Rule 50(2)(c). iv. On the requirement relating to news disseminated through the mass media 42. The Court further finds that the Application meets the requirement of Rule 50(2)(d) of the Rules since it is not based on news disseminated through the mass media, but rather relates to decisions, laws and regulations of the Respondent State. v. On the requirement relating to the exhaustion of local remedies 43. The Court notes, with regard to the exhaustion of local remedies under Rule 50(2)(e), that the Application is based on allegations of human rights violations in relation to Law No. 2018-02 amending and supplementing Organic Law No. 94-027 of 18 March 1999 on the HJC, Memorandum No. 914/MEF/DC//SGM/DGI of 13 December 2017 on the issuance of tax clearance, Law No. 2019-40 of 1 November 2019 on constitutional amendment and Law No. 2019-43 of 15 November 2019 on the Electoral Code. 15