76. The Court finds that the foregoing facts as alleged by the Defendant aré not contested by the Applicants. The Court therefore concludes that the Applicants have had the possibility of coming before the competent rights in proceedings for effective remedy; and courts to claim their on that ground, the Court concludes that the Applicants’ right to effective remedy was not violated. FOR THESE REASONS 77. The Court, Adjudicating in a public hearing, after: hearing both Parties, in a matter. on human rights violation, and joining the preliminary procedures to the merits of . the case, in last resort; - Admits the’ various requests brodght by the Applicants in their Application;: - Adjudges that the ban imposed Prosecutor and the Special to prevent them on the Applicants by the Public Prosecutor of the Anti Illegal-Wealth Court, ae, going outside the national territory, because it has no legal basis; is i> fule-- | Adjudges that the Republic of Senegal violated the right to presumption , of innocence; the declarations of its Special Prosecutor, in violation of | Article 7 of Law 81-53 of 10 July 1981, were unlawful; the Haute Court de Justice was invested with the mandate to institute the proceedings; Adjudges that it has no jurisdiction to examine the lawfulness or - otherwise of the reactivation of Law 81-53 of 19 July 1981 relating to the . Combat of llegal-Wealth, Wealth Court; and of Law 81-54 creating the Anti Illegal- !' - _Adjudges that the Court has no jurisdiction to make orders of injunction to the Republic of Senegal in respect of its domestic laws and internal procedures; 23 ~.