00089r the officialgazette and once in a national newspaperwith widespread circulation; and lt This judgment, in its entirety in English, on the official website of the Respondent State, and remain available for a period of one (1) year. 151. The court considers that even though a judgment in favor of the Applic ant, per se, can constitute a sufficient form of reparation for moral damages, such measure can also be ordered where the circumstances of the case so require.3T 152. ln the present case, the Court notes that, as it has earlier found, the violation 6f the right to dignity was established beyond the individual case of the Applicant and is illustrative of a systemic practice. The Court further notes that its findings in this judgment bear on several rights protected in the Charter, which are those to the integrity of the person, dignity, residence and movement as well as to be tried within a reasonable time. 153.As a consequence of the foregoing, the court finds that the prayer for the judgment to be published is warranted, however with a variation from the Applicant's request in order to enhance public awareness. The Court therefore grants the prayer that this Judgment be published on the websites of the Judiciary and the Ministry for Constitutional and Legal Affairs, and remains accessible for at least one (1) year after the date of publication. rx. cosTs 154. ln terms of Rule 30 of the Rules "unless othenryise decided by the Court, each party shall bear its own costs." 155. The court considers that, in line with its previous judgments, reparation may include payment of legal fees and other expenses incurred in the course of 37 Armand Guehi v. Tanzania (Merits and Repa Tanzania (Reparatio ns), Sg 45 nd 46(5) (Reparations), g 98. ns), S 194; See Reverend Christopher R. Mtikita v Norbeft Zongo and Others v. Burkina Faso nd 37