000893 143. This court has also held, in the judgment it rendered in the Konatl case, that,,... reparation shall include all the damages suffered by the victim and in particular, includes restitution, compensation, rehabilitation of the victim as well as measures deemed appropriate to ensure the non-repetition of the violations, taking into account the circumstance of each case". ln the same case, the court ordered the Respondent State to, inter alia, "expunge from the Applicant's judicial records, all criminal convictions pronounced against him".33 144. The Court notes that, in the instant case, the Applicant requests for compensation and other forms of reparations for the concerned violations. Given that the prayers for compensation and other forms of reparations have been duly considered earlier and remedies granted where it was deemed proper, this Court considers that they are sufficient and an order for the Applicant to be placed in the situation before his deportation is not warranted. The prayer is therefore dismissed. ii. Non-repetition 145. The Applicant prays the Court to order that the Respondent State guarantees non-repetition of the violations against him and reports back to the Court every six (6) months untilthe orders are implemented. 146. The Court considers that, as it has held in the matter of Armand Guehiv. tlnited Republic of Tanzania, guarantees of non-repetition seek to address systemic and structural violations rather than to remedy individual harm.3a The Court has 33 Lohd lssa Konatd v. Burkina Faso (Reparations), g 58. u Armand Guehi v. Tanzania (Merits and Reparations), $ 191. See also Norbert Zongo and Others v. Burkina Faso (Reparations), gg 103-106; African Comm ission on Human and Peoples' Rights, General Comment No. 4 on the African Charter on H uman and Peoples' Rights: The Right to Redress for Victims of Torture and Other Cruel, lnhuman or Deg rading Punishment or Treatment (Article S), S 10 (2017). See also Case of the "Street Child " Villag -Morales et al. v. Guatemala, lnter-American Cou rt of Human Rights, Judgment on Repara (26 May 2001) 35 .)rt' )"n*td @.