OCI0895 134. The Applicant also prays the court to award US Dollars Fifteen Thousand (g 15,000) to the identified indirect victims namety: Ms. Adete Mutobe (wife), and Seraphin Mutuza lkili, Papy lkili, Berthe lkili, Frederic lkili, Azama lkili, Carine lkili, Lucien lkili, Marie lkili, Peter lkili, Faustin lkili, Asha tkiti, Kisubi lkili and Julienne lkili (children), for the loss suffered, including the emotional pain and anguish as a result of the Applicant's arrest, detention, torture and deportation, considering he was the breadwinner of the family. 135. The court considers, regarding this prayer, that as it has held in the Zongo case, indirect victims must prove their relation to the Applicant to be entiled to damages. Spouses should produce their marriage certificate and life certificate or any other equivalent proof, and children should produce their birth certificate or any other equivalent evidence to show proof of their filiation.ze 136. The court notes that, in support of this claim, the Applicant provides a list, which includes the names of his wife and children as earlier reproduced without adducing any of the aforementioned pieces of evidence of relation to the alleged indirect victims. 137. The Court considers however that in the instant case, the fact that the Applicant had a wife and children at the time of the violations is established. This fact is expressly and consistenfly acknowleged by the Respondent state in its submissions. The same fact is confirmed in the judgment delivered by the High Court of Tanzania in Civil Case No. 1 18 of 2007, although this decision referred to only "seven children"30 and expressly identified the wife as .Adela Lucien',, and two of the children as "Rashid Kazimoto" and "Vicent Rashid".31 As a consequence, there is a prima facie relation of the Applicant to these alleged victims, and the latter are therefore entitled to reparation if any is granted by this Court. 2s /dem, g 54. so See Luclen lkili Rashid v. Musa Ruban Jerome Msewa, Permanent Secretary, Min istry of Home Affairs, and Aftorn ey General Co of Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Civil Case No 118 of 2007, Judgment of 2 Jan uary 2014 31 ldem, page 7. Yf'*q JJ