not have sufficient information upon which to determine the merits of the said
Communication.
26. The Commission recalls the following jurisprudence which were similarly struck
out for want of diligent prosecution, following failure of the Complainants to
transmit submissions on the merits: Communication 336/2007: AFTRADEMOP
and Global Welfare Association (on behalf of the Moko-oh Indigenous Peoples
of Cameroon) v. Cameroon,2 Communication 321/2006: Law Society of
Zimbabwe et a1/ Zimbabwe,3 Communication 285/2004: Mr Kizila Watumbulwa
v. Democratic Republic of the Congo.4
Decision of the Commission on Strike Out
27. In the light of the analysis made above, the Commission decides to strike out this
Communication against the Republic of Botswana, for want of diligent
prosecution.
,.,,.-;; NON
,/4'?
·'?''-' c: CP
/ ,..._":-'
5�
...,
l.q
'10
Communication 336/2007: AFTRADEMOP and Global Welfare Association (on beh�-Jf o
Indigenous Peoples of Cameroon) v. Cameroon (2013) ACHPR
5 n
3
Communication 321/2006: Law Society of Zimbabwe et al/ Zimbabwe (2013) ACHPF.
4 Communication 285/2004: Mr Kizila Watumbulwa/ Democratic Republic of the Co go '
2
t
6
�<- ), -'�ICAJN\:. O
' '•1,i,.,
':.:-._<-£roEs
.....
t::