Munyandu Tembani and Benjamin John Freeth (represented by Norman Tjombe) v Angola and Thirteen Others that the provision requires that a case “ nolonger be under consideration under an international dispute-settlement procedure”38 Further, that the other international body must have decided the case on the merits and there is a ‘final settlement’ by that body.39 The settlement must, as the Commission has previously stated, a human-right adjudicatory body.40 In the present case, there is no evidence to suggest that this matter was settled by another international adjudicatory body. It thus complies with sub-Article 7. 54. The Commission finds that the Complainants have failed to satisfy Article 56(5) and (6) of the Charter. 55. The Commission declares this Communication inadmissible. Done at the 75th Ordinary Session of the Commission held in Banjul, The Gambia from the 3rd to the 23rd of May 2023. 38 Communication 409/12, 30 April 2014, para 112. Communication 260/02 : Bakweri Land Claims Committee v Cameroon, 4 December 2004, para 52 and 53. 40 Communication 279/03-296/05 : Sudan Human Rights Organisation & Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE) v Sudan, 27 May 2009, para 103. 39 17

Select target paragraph3