Rover Discovery-TDl 300 since it was seized by the police. She also stated that she cannot produce the logbook for the motor cycle registration number T 292 AWD since she does not remember who has the logbook. The Applicant also stated that she is unable to produce business permits for her fishing business since she was operating this on a small and informal scale. * 147. The Respondent State submits that the claim for monetary damages as a result of the alleged appropriation of her car and motorcycle is unsubstantiated as the Applicant has not adduced any proof of her ownership of the alleged properties or that the alleged properties were taken by the police. The Respondent State thus prays the Court to dismiss the claim for monetary damages. *** 148. The Court notes that for reparations for material prejudice to be granted, there must be a causal link between the violation established by the Court and the prejudice suffered, but the Applicant must also specify the nature of the prejudice and the proof thereof.50 149. In the instant Application, the Court has established that the Applicant’s rights protected by Articles 4, 5 and 7 of the Charter were violated. However, the Court notes that the Applicant has not established the causal link between the violation of her earlier stated rights and the alleged loss of her motorcycle and car. 150. The Court reiterates that with regard to material prejudice, the general rule is that the burden of proof is on the Applicant.51 Given the absence of 50 Kijiji Isiaga v. United Republic of Tanzania, ACtHPR, Application No. 032/2015, Judgment of 25 June 2021 (reparations), § 20. 51 Lohé Issa Konaté v. Burkina Faso (reparations), § 15. Mohamed Abubakari v. Tanzania, (reparations) (4 July 2019) 3 AfCLR 334, § 22; Kijiji Isiaga v. Tanzania (reparations), § 15. 42