ff��}ACHPR ·v ' · /. African Cornrrnss1on on Human and Peoples' Rights Human Rights our Co!lectve Responsibility evidence and arguments within the stipulated time and neither did they apply for an extension. 20. Almost seven (7) years have lapsed since the expiry of the deadline, and no evidence or arguments have been submitted by the Complainants on the admissibility of the Communication. 21. In light of the above, the Commission finds that the Complainants have not shown an interest in prosecuting this Communication. 22. The Commission takes note of its jurisprudence, including Communications 594/15 Mohammed Ramadan Mahmoud Fayad Allah v. Arab Republic of Egtjpt; 612/16 Ahmed Mohammed Ali Subaie v. Arab Republic of Egypt; 412/12 Journal Echos du Nord v. Republic of Gabon and Communication 387/10 Kofi Yamagnane v. Togo, which were struck out similarly for want of diligent prosecution. Decision of the African Commission 23. In view of the foregoing, the Commission rules that the Complaint be struck out. Adopted at the Seventy-fourth (74th) Ordinary Session of the African Commission held in Banjul, The Gambia, from 21 February to 7 March �---- 41Page 4