5. He therefore prayed the Court to order the Respondent State to reinstate him as Paymaster, immediately deconfiscate his landed property, annul his criminal sentence of ten years' imprisonment, the pay him the sum of Eight Billion (8,000,000,000) United States dollars as reparation for the extra-patrimonial damage he suffered, pay himOne Billion One Hundred And Eighty-Eight Million (1,188,000,000) US dollars in damages for violation of his property rights, pay him the sum of Twenty Million (20,000,000) US dollars in back pay and benefits, reimburse him legal fees and expenses and to publish the judgment in the "Fraternité Matin" daily newspaper. 6. The Court delivered its judgment on 2 December 2021, the operative part of which is as follows: On jurisdiction i. Finds that it has jurisdiction to hear the alleged violations committed after the date of entry into force of the Protocol in regard to the Respondent State. On admissibility ii. Finds that the objection based on inadmissibility is founded in relation to the prohibition of arbitrary arrest and detention and the alleged violation of the right to the respect of his political opinion; iii. Declares inadmissible the allegation of violation of the right to work, to remuneration and to property; iv. Dismisses the objection based on the alleged violations of the right to be tried within a reasonable time; v. Declares the Application admissible. On merits 3