down in sub-rule 1 of this Rule have been met, and be accompanied by a copy of all relevant supporting documents. 25. With regard to the indication of the judgment whose review is sought, the Court notes that in the present case the Applicant indicates that he is seeking review of the judgment delivered by the Court on 2 December 2021 in Application No. 034/2017: Kouadio Kobena Fory v. Republic of Côte d'Ivoire. Therefore, this requirement is met. 26. Furthermore, in accordance with Rule 78(1) of the Rules, in order to be admissible, the Request for Review must be filed within six (6) months from the date on which the Applicant became aware of the new fact or at least five (5) years from the date of the Judgment (A). The Applicant must also prove the existence of facts or evidence that he or she considers to be new (B). A. On compliance with the time-limits 27. The Court observes that, in accordance with Rule 78(1) of the Rules of Court, it shall reject of its own motion any application for review of its judgment filed five (5) years after its delivery. In the present case, the judgment in respect of which a review is sought was delivered on 2 December 2021 and the application for review was received at the Court Registry on 17 January 2022, that is, one (1) month and fifteen (15) days after the notification of delivery of the Judgment. 28. Accordingly, the present Application meets the requirement of the five (5)-yeartime-limit. 29. With regard to the requirement to comply with a time limit of six (6) months from the discovery of the new fact or evidence, the Applicant submits that it was after reading the Judgment of 2 December 2021 that he discovered evidence, claiming that he was not aware of it at the time the judgment was delivered. In this regard, the Court notes that it was on 27 December 2021 that the Applicant received a 9