PULP MILLS (JUDGMENT) 106 mechanism of CARU, in conformity with the provisions of the 1975 Statute, and found appropriate solutions to their differences within its framework without feeling the need to resort to the judicial settlement of disputes provided for in Article 60 of the Statute until the present case was brought before the Court. * * * 282. For these reasons, THE COURT, (1) By thirteen votes to one, Finds that the Eastern Republic of Uruguay has breached its procedural obligations under Articles 7 to 12 of the 1975 Statute of the River Uruguay and that the declaration by the Court of this breach constitutes appropriate satisfaction ; IN FAVOUR : Vice-President Tomka, Acting President ; Judges Koroma, AlKhasawneh, Simma, Abraham, Keith, Sepúlveda-Amor, Bennouna, Skotnikov, Cançado Trindade, Yusuf, Greenwood ; Judge ad hoc Vinuesa ; AGAINST : Judge ad hoc Torres Bernárdez ; (2) By eleven votes to three, Finds that the Eastern Republic of Uruguay has not breached its substantive obligations under Articles 35, 36 and 41 of the 1975 Statute of the River Uruguay ; IN FAVOUR : Vice-President Tomka, Acting President ; Judges Koroma, Abraham, Keith, Sepúlveda-Amor, Bennouna, Skotnikov, Cançado Trindade, Yusuf, Greenwood ; Judge ad hoc Torres Bernárdez ; AGAINST : Judges Al-Khasawneh, Simma ; Judge ad hoc Vinuesa ; (3) Unanimously, Rejects all other submissions by the Parties. Done in French and in English, the French text being authoritative, at the Peace Palace, The Hague, this twentieth day of April, two thousand and ten, in three copies, one of which will be placed in the archives of the Court and the others transmitted to the Government of the Argentine Republic and the Government of the Eastern Republic of Uruguay, respectively. (Signed) Vice-President. (Signed) Peter TOMKA, Vice-President. (Signed) Philippe COUVREUR, Registrar. 96