extend beyond removal from office and disqualification to hold public office in the Republic; but the party may be tried at law for the same offense. The Legislature shall prescribe the procedure for impeachment proceedings which shall be in conformity with the requirements of due process of law.” 87.This Court observes that from the above stated constitutional provisions, Section 43 only provides the core of the law but the penumbra aspect of the law which is expected to prescribe in details the procedure for impeachment in Liberia is conferred upon the Legislature to be fashioned out in accordance with due process of the law. The begging question in this suit is whether the Applicant’s impeachment was based on procedure prescribed by the Legislature and if it was, whether the procedure was in conformity with the requirement of due process of law as contemplated by the Respondent’s Constitution. 88.The Applicant argues that Section 29 of the 1986 Constitution of the Respondent provides that: “the legislative power of the Republic shall be vested in “the Legislature” of Liberia which shall consist of two (2) separate houses: a Senate and a House of Representatives, both of which must pass on all legislations. The enacting style shall be: ‘It is enacted by the Senate and House of the Representatives of the Republic of Liberia in Legislature assembled’”. 89.So when the Constitution expressly imposes a duty on “the Legislature” to prescribe the procedure for impeachment, it contemplates that the two Houses, Senate and Representatives shall pass on a legislation prescribing the rules for impeachment proceedings “in Legislature assembled”. Additionally, Section 35