d. A DECLARATION that this application is inadmissible as it seeks to have this Court assume and exercise jurisdiction over the persons of individual as parties Defendant/Respondent contrary to the competence of this court. e. A DECLARATION that the application is inadmissible because the applicant was given a fair hearing before the appropriate forum/body duly constituted under the laws of Liberia. f. That the Court should declare this case inadmissible because it is void of purpose, decline to make any award of damages of any nature, or for any reason or purpose, the court should deny the claim of the Applicant and access cost of proceedings against the Applicant for bringing a frivolous and unmeritorious Application. 43.The Respondents also attached as Annexures all the relevant documents in support of their claims. VII. JURISDICTION: 44.The Respondents, by way of objection to the jurisdiction and competence of the Court to entertain the matter submit as follows: i. “That the Court lacks jurisdiction over the person of individuals as defendant; ii. That the Court lacks the competence to adjudicate on cases which require the Court to interpret and apply domestic laws of member states; iii. That the instant suit requires the Court to sit as an appellate court and to review the decisions made by the Supreme Court of Liberia and actions taken by its Legislative Assembly; 19