As the title indicates, this report produced by the Applicants is, in their view, a prediction allegedly made by Dr. V. Umbritch on the undue prolongation of the procedure in respect of the settlement of the terminal entitlements of the former employees of the EAC. ix. Letter from Crown Minister of Finance, Agent dated Economic 25 February Affairs and 1987 addressed Planning, Mr. to the former Cleopa D. Msuya signed by the Fund Manager, Mr. Collyer. The Applicants also produced this document to justify, as they said, “giving details of the distribution of EAC funds on 20 January 1987”. 18. For the foregoing reasons, the Applicants pray the Court to review the Judgement of 28 March 2014. The Respondent’s submissions 19. For its part, in its Response to the Application, the Respondent maintained that the decisions of the African Court are final and not subject to appeal, except where key new evidence has been discovered which was not within the knowledge of the Applicants at the time the judgement was delivered. 20. According to the Respondent, the letters dated 2011, Newspaper of 16 the edition March 5 October 2011 2011, the letter of 11 and 1 November May 2012, the Newspaper edition of 13 August 2007, the EAC Mediation Agreement and the 20102012 Reports of the Legal and Human Rights Centre produced by the Applicants do not constitute new evidence in support of exhaustion of local remedies, given the fact that an appeal procedure involving these documents was still pending under Case No. 73/2004. 9|F AX ge / e- ‘> ae . E> \. Us