Court also holds that the said reparation granted by the Supreme Court of Mali which may not have been to the satisfaction constitutes different (l issue. In any responded that it has no jurisdiction of the applicant case the Court has alreadu to adjudicate upon decisions made by the domestic courts of Member States of the Community.' 35. We endorse the said opinion and stand firmly by it but emphasized that there is a thin divide of not reviewing the decision but hearing the matters that flow from the decisions which allegedly pose the questions of violations of human rights particularly holding charge the applicant/plaintiff in this case where upon a is detained with no trial would be said to be different from the order itself. 36. The question of a holding charge became relevant in this matter raised by the defendants' counsel that we found this definition which is of interest in Black's Law Dictionary Deluxe Ninth Edition page '(1949) A criminal charge of some minor accused in custody while prosecutors andprepare 37. offense filed 800, thus: to keep the take time to build a bigger case more serious charge.' The process that resulted to a holding charge and the order made thereon is not the issue that was emphasized but whether the flow from the order which plaintiff/applicant allegedly violated the human rights of the and whether same allegation can be said to fall within the purview of Article 9(4) of the Protocol should be a matter for this Court. ~ .)8, .\ncdll'r point canvassed amendment consideration by tile defendants IS III respect (;1 the' of the pleadings at the stage the applicant brought same for and granting same. The Court agrees with defendants the motion to put forward more documentary that evidence in support of the