It is also on record that the Plaintiffs have rightly appealed against the decision to the Supreme Court of Liberia- a Court of competent jurisdiction which form the materials before the Court has discharged and acquitted the Plaintiffs. This Court cannot determine whether or not the procedure adopted by the trial court in deciding to admit that piece of evidence is correct or not without reviewing that judgment. Furthermore the order sought by the Plaintiffs as reproduced above is for a reversal of the said judgment which this Court has no competence to do. In Bakary Sarres case where a similar application was brought, this Court after analyzing the case of the Plaintiffs and finding that the applicants seek that the Court sit afresh, by examining judgments No 116 of the Supreme Court of Mali and order a reversal of the pronouncement made by the said Supreme Court in connection with the administrative proceedings concluded: That it can be deduced from the application filled by Mr. Bakery Sarre and 28 others against The Republic of Mali ……. seeks to project the Court of Justice of ECOWAS as a court of cassation over the Supreme Court of Mali. Viewed from that angle, the Honourable Court declares that it has no jurisdiction to adjudicate on the matter. In line with the above reasoning and in view of the above analysis, the Court holds that the action of the Plaintiff’s fails as none of their rights under the 29