the outcome of the hearing. Chancellor of the By a letter of 8 November University, as had been 1999, the Vice- recommended by the Disciplinary Committee, issued a warning of insubordination against the Applicant, and arranged that he be counselled on class conduct. 20. Two lecturers were mandated to, and did attend, some of the Applicant's lectures for observation and assessment. They subsequently submitted a report report was adverse. lecturer. to the Principal, dated 30 November 1999. The In effect, it said the Applicant was not a competent After receiving this report, the Principal in turn wrote a letter on 30 November 1999 to the Vice-Chancellor of the University calling for the dismissal of the Applicant in the interests of the students. According to the Applicant, the Vice-Chancellor called him to his office and briefed him about what transpired at the college by showing adverse report of 30 November also of 30 received a November letter, 1999. dated the 1999, On same 2 the Applicant the as well as the Principal’s fetter, December day, from 1999, the the Applicant Registrar of the University, informing him that his employment had been terminated with immediate effect. |t stated, amongst others, that it was report that the Applicant had taken no steps to change clear from his manner the of teaching, which had been criticized by the lecturers who assessed him, and then filed the adverse report dated 30 November MEER 2 =