001338 the Respondent state to take all necessary measures for the rehearing of the case on the sentencing of the Applicants through a process that does not allow a mandatory imposition of the death penalty, while upholding the full discretion of the judicial officer. 159. As for the prayer that the Applicants be released, the court holds that in light of its earlier findings in respect of the conviction and sentencing of the Applicants, an order for release is not warranted. The prayer is consequenfly dismissed. 160. Regarding the prayer for restoration in the situation prior to the violations, the court considers that the finding in respect of the prayer to be released applies. This prayer is equally dismissed. ii. 161. Non-repetition The Applicants prays the court to order that the Respondent state guarantees non-repetition of the violations against them and reports back to the Court every six (6) months until the orders are implemented. 162. The Court considers that, as it has held in the case of Lucien lkili Rashidi v. united Republic of ranzania, guarantees of non-repetition are generally aimed at addressing violations that are systemic and structural in nature rather than to remedy individual harm.5s The court has however also held that nonrepetition could apply in individual cases where there is a likelihood of continued or repeated violations.s6 55 see Lucren lkili Rashidi v. Tanzania, op. ot-, $$, 146-i49. see also, Armand Guehi v. Tanzania, op. $ 191; and NorbertZongo and Othersv. Burkina Faso (Reparations), gg 103-106. sfl.,see Lucien lkili Rashidi v. Tanzania, op. crt; see atso Aimand oieiiv. Tanzania, op. Reverend Chistopher R. lvftikila v. Tanzania (Reparations), g 43. 44 cit.: and