001343 139. The Applicants further pray the Court to grant compensation to their family members, as indirect victims, for the prejudice suffered given that "the wives were affected by the sudden loss of their husbands who were the sole source of income, they lived with the stigma of having a convict as a husband, they had to bring up the children by themselves, they were not able to increase the number of children"; "the Applicants' mothers have sutfered losing their sons to imprisonment and the social stigma of having a son who is a criminal." 140. Finally, the Applicants pray the Court to award them various amounts in legal fees for the costs incurred in proceedings both before domestic courts and this Court. i. a. 141 Material loss Loss of income . The Court notes, regarding the prayer for compensation due to loss of income and property, that the Applicants allege that they were business men at the time of their incarceration and lost their cows, chickens, houses, bicycle and other properties as a result. The Applicants do not provide any evidence in support of the claims.a3 The prayer is therefore dismissed. 142. The prayer for compensation due to the deterioration of their health which occasioned expenses related to hospitalisation while in prison is equally dismissed for lack of evidence. b. Costs of proceedings 143. before domestic courts The Court considers that, in line with its previous judgments, reparation may include payment of legal fees and other expenses incurred in the course a3 See Armand Guehi v. Tanzania (Merits and Reparations), $ 178 39 I