7. Briefly, the Applicant avers that on 15th October 2009, he was
arrested on suspicion that he had committed murder of one Ernest
Manirumva. He alleges that following his arrest, he was not charged
within the time prescribed by the Burundi Code of Penal Procedure
and has since then been subjected to arbitrary and unlawful
detention by agents of the Government of Burundi.
8. He claims that the acts/omissions of the Government of Burundi
was an infringement of Article 6(d) of the Treaty since they violate
the fundamental principles of the East African Community. He
further claims that the matter gained so much notoriety that the
2nd Respondent is bound to have known and ought to have taken
action pursuant to Articles 29(1) and 71(1) (d) of the Treaty.
9. The Applicant therefore seeks declarations from the Court that:
a) Keeping him in detention is an infringement of Article
6(d) of the Treaty;
b) The Secretary General failed to fulfil his obligations
under Articles 29 and 71(1)(d) of the Treaty;
c) He has a full right to enjoy his freedom without any prior
condition;
d) An order that he be immediately released;
e) The costs of the reference.
FIRST RESPONDENT’S CASE
10.
The 1st Respondent’s case is set out in his response and
amended response to the Reference filed on 26th March 2012 and
22nd February 2013 respectively.
REFERENCE NO.3 OF 2012
Page 4