7 31. On the 8th of March 2021, the secretariat subsequently wrote to the Complainant again regarding the substance of her observations. The letter reiterated the absence of observations on admissibility per Article 56 of the Charter. Furthermore, the complainant was informed that failure to make admissibility arguments would compel the Commission to strike out her communication for lack of diligent prosecution. 32. On the 17th of March 2021, the complainant wrote to the secretariat extension of 30 days to file adequate admissibility observations. 33. By letter dated 8 June 2021, the secretariat granted:'tln,e complainant an extension of 30 days. She was also informed that per Rule 113 of the 2010 rules, this would be the sole extension of time and was not renewable. This decision of the secretariat was also transmitted to the Respondent state in a Note Verbale dated 8 June 2021. 34. On the 4th of July 2021, the complaint submitted,,%J:!at she considered on admissibility following her exteris~on of ti,ir1~;>";'( 35. On the 26th of July 2021, those submissions Zambia. THE SUBMISSIONS/FROM were transmitted requesting an observations to the Republic of THE COMPLAINANT e- i , .. ,_,~:~d1( 36. The bulk of tfi~~.complainant' s submissions are factual averments on the situations giving rise to the complaint. Rarely does the complainant make a legal argument, and in those instances all the arguments relate to the merits of the case and not admissibility. There is only one remote and ineffectual reference to admissibility per Article 56, both of which were.iruletters and not in the submissions. In her letter of the 11 th of N6ve~Qer 2020~the complainant said "I have read the rules of procedure in Articles 59,~dij58 !of the African Charter on human and people's rights and I believe tliatrny'fresh complainant meets the requirements of those articles. I will be re-submitting the facts stated in documents I sent on 5 and 6 November 2020 to ensure that they are compatible." In a subsequent paragraph in the letter she further avers that "I have exhausted all possible avenues in recourse to justice in Zambia and the ruling is based on facts on a communication in which the commission already took a decision and currently seized with, and prolonging submission of this complainant may lead to further rights infringements and may leave room for further litigation in the matter already under seizure if the Commission. I have also submitted the information so that all matters can be determined to finali ." Save for these miniscule references, the rest of the complainant's argume . etflalt<f ~ ll, of her account of the facts of the present communication generall 0'" ~c.~€-'ARI4r ~0-i'~ ;0- C:>(,,;- _ 7 <J,-.P~ § :'.~~;) I ~ ~ :i", ' o......C~. '\ == -< ff(/l, . .... I 1'.\.' \)p.. ~,:.~. '~-.I':'- Q '? x.Q'V $)/ ,"'V\ A.K\Cp..\~ ~x..v~ .::?MME r.' o€-:"",' .~", .... ~~~ I..