19.TheCourt therefore deduces from the foregoing, that the Application brought by Mr. Aliyu Tasheku is essentially the sameas the one filed before the Nigerian judge, which subject-matter has already been dealt with and which outcome the Applicant neither contested nor considered to be dissatisfactory since he did not appeal the judgment before any Nigerian 8court. The Applicant did not also indicate that the Nigerian authorities refused to implement the decisions made by the judge at the High Court. Equally, hebrought forth no new complaint or new application that may be entertained by the Honorable Court. The Court cannot retry a case on which a judgment of the domestic court of a Member State has already been delivered and against which no contestation has been raised. Consequently, the Court declares that the Application brought by Mr. Aliyu Tasheku is inadmissible.DECISION For These Reasons,20.The Court,Adjudicating publicly, after hearing both Parties, and after deliberating towards this ruling, -Adjudges that the Court has jurisdiction to adjudicate on the case;-Adjudges that in the instant case, the Application brought by Mr. Aliyu Tasheku is essentially the same as the one already decided upon by the Nigerian court;-Adjudges, consequently, that the Application is inadmissible.