159/96 : Union interafricaine des droits de l'Homme, Fédération internationale des ligues des droits de l'Homme, Rencontre africaine des droits de l'Homme, Organisation nationale des droits de l'Homme au Sénégal and Association malienne des droits de l'Homme / Angola Facts 1. The communication is jointly filed by UIDH, FIDH, RADDHO, ONDH and AMDH. All these NG0s are acting in this case on behalf of certain West African nationals expelled from Angola in 1996. According to the Complainants, between April and September 1996, the Angolan government rounded up and expelled West African nationals on its territory. These illegal expulsions were preceded by acts of brutality committed against Senegalese, Malian, Gambian, Mauritanian and other nationals. Those affected lost in the process their belongings. Complaint 2. The Complainants maintain that the Angolan State violated the provisions of Articles 2, 7 paragraph 1 (a), 12 paragraphs 4and 5 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. Procedure th 3. The communication is not dated, but it was received during the 20 session of the Commission, held in Grand Bay, Mauritius in October 1996. th 4. On 24 October 1996 the Secretariat acknowledged receipt of the communication. th 5. On 19 December 1996 the Secretariat notified the Angolan government of the communication. 6. During its 21st Session in Nouakchott (Mauritania) in April 1997, the Commission declared the communication admissible. rd 7. The government and the Complainants were informed of this decision on 23 June 1997. nd 8. At the 22 Session in November 1997, the Commission ruled on the merits of the case. Law Admissibility 9. The Commission considered the issue of admissibility of this communication on the basis of information furnished by the Complainants. It deplores the fact that the Defendant State did not th respond to the notification sent to it on 19 December 1996, following the decision of the seizure of the Commission. 10. Article 57 of the Charter implicitly indicates that the State Party to the said Charter against which allegation of human rights violations are levelled is required to consider them in good faith and to furnish the Commission with all information at its disposal to enable the latter to come to an equitable decision. In this case, in view of the Defendant State's refusal to cooperate with the Commission, the latter can only give more weight to the accusations made by the Complainants and this on the basis of the evidence furnished by them. 11. The evidence shows that between April and September 1996, the government of the Republic of Angola embarked on mass expulsion of aliens from its territory, and that these expulsions were illegal and arbitrary, and in violation of 12 paragraphs 4 and 5 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. 12. According to information at the disposal of the Commission, it appears that those expelled did not have the possibility to challenge their expulsion in court. In communication 71/92 Rencontre africaine

Sélectionner le paragraphe cible3