USD17,826,038.94 to the public. The Applicant also alleged that
acting as a whistle-blower, he brought that malpractice to the
attention of the Inspector General of the Government (hereinafter
referred to as “the IGG”) who started investigations and produced a
report that confirmed the said loss.
8. In her report, the IGG recommended to the Government to consider
recovery of the payments made above the 15% mark-up for drugs
purchased
illegally
from
QCIL,
which
amounted
to
USD17,826,038.94.
9. Whereas the Applicant expected a reward in accordance with Article
19 of Whistle-blowers Protection Act, 2010 and in the light of the
conclusions and recommendations of the IGG, the latter, by a
turnabout, reviewed her conclusions related to the recovery of the
alleged loss highlighted in the aforesaid report, hence the filing of this
Reference.
D. THE APPLICANTS’ CASE
10. The Applicant’s case is contained in his Amended Reference, his
reply to the Respondent’s Response filed on 20th May, 2014, his
Affidavit sworn on 17th June, 2014, his written submissions filed on
17th November, 2014 and his rejoinder to the Respondent’s
submissions filed on the 12th January, 2015.
In summary, the
Applicant’s case is as follows: In the course of the year 2009, the Applicant got information
alleging that the Government of Uganda, through the National
Medical Stores procured ARVs under the MoU dated 14th
December, 2005 between the Government of Uganda and QCIL
Reference No. 5 of 2013
Page 4