p African Commission on Human and Peoples' Righ~s Human Rights our Collective Responsibility 31. On 25 October 2016, the Commission received the Respondent State's First Submission on Merits dated 1 A 2016, which was transmitted to the I Complainants. : I Admissibility Submissions of the Complainants 32. The Complainants submitted that the present Communication fulfils all the admissibility requirements set out in 56 of Charter. out a prima facie x, which they fulfilled. They !X;~~.~!;~are an their 33. According to the Complainants, the violation of Articles 5, 17, 18, 19, 22 contend cannot be fulfilled unless contend that they currently live affront to their dignity and h eviction. n~T'T .... application for provided suitable since then not only never indicated when will be forthcoming. They ct"~."r~>c denying their right to tion of their aforesaid rights 34. The Complainants asserted an order prohibiting alternative failed to offer claim that housing, under the 35. Specifically, t State's contention that the COrn1nunication facie violation of the African Charter, v: -\"';~'"'>:\>-'_' the ~Q,mR~a~B,c:mts and inactions of the Municipality which '1:lfl.s l'ea(~'q;,tJ;leir liviIlg in poor conditions, as well as the fact that they n¢~ ,';fat~;;,t'a.n.., ..eviction due to the Municipality's misrepres~pf~tion ~ri~;;:rt~glect," a serious violation of the Applicants' right to re~R~ctof the''[iignity that is na.-an.,. in a human being" and amounts to degrading a:i\9.}pJ1umantreatment, rr.r,t+.:. to Article 5 of the African Charter+ 36. Furthermore.The Complainants su based on the outcome of the p following: 4 that the Communication is not only eviction application, but also on the See Applicants' Response to Respondent's Second Submission Republic of South Africa (dated 8 March 2013)