ACH African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights State Party should be just as clear and should have sufficient detail as to inform or omissions that have occasioned a viola, Human Rights our Collective Responsibility as the complaint itself and State concerned of the specific acts of the African Charter. 162. Yet, unlike the established practice ' submitting a dedicated written submission on the merits advancing 1rnAn1~c. in support of the allegations that specific Articles of the African Charter have been violated, the Complainants in this Communication not to submit their written arguments on the merits when called by the Commission to do so. Rather, in their email to the Commission on 28 elected to rely on their "written submissions on the . tion 377/09 Mendukazi Patricia Monakali."42In .on parts 5 and 7 of their Written Submissions on the unication dated 8 March 2013. This information was ·ts. of which the Respondent State filed communica that the Resp 24 of the the to conduct is substantial so, they take how their case is together with the rest Complaint by which this by the Complainants T1c.1.O\nc of Articles 5, 17, 18, 19, 22 and allegations has been articulated in admissibility and the reply to the 164. At t~~;;:fimethe y on their admissibility arguments, the S~~~~'t~t~kg!~not that the reliance on those arguments by the CpmpJa;ili,ant~~ by itself, was acceptable to the Commission. SimilarIY~::\me/RespC)~Q:~nt State had knowledge of the nature of the Complairi't::{?ndthe n.!iErIn arguments of Complainants. Having been duly served witl\'B\allthe written submissions which the Complainants chose to place relianc~'~!i:l,nd having specifically to each of the Complainants' substantive ar'guments in its own submissions, the Resp~~~e~ cannot be heard to argue that" it is not, • what the allega~t, ie~~iY, ?i: thg,o<~i' 0' rvU U'. ~ Respondent are that need to be answered .43 ff ':> \ ~ %\ 'S, ff~ See Complainants Attorney's reply to the 377 of the Complainant" dated 28 January 2016 para the Commission's email dated 16 May 2016 para 3. 43 First Submission on Merits on behalf of the Republic 42 i.~ &i ~ ~)\ :~a~:l1i~1C/)' ~ s em,ail titled "Re: LeU: ~, .., "~~'1'{1' 1". ~ {<-0 Also see Complainants atto¥~leysq;eF~~6-1"~":J'X~'" ~ South Africa, para 5.2. ............ _,.- Page 32 of 51