respect of Criminal Case Number 321 of 1996 and the record of proceedings at the High Court in respect of Criminal Appeal Number 82 of 1998 and the lack of information regarding his application for review. Article 9(1) relates to the right to receive information in connection with the right to express and disseminate one's opinions within the law. The Court finds that since the requests for the record of proceedings of the High Court were made in the context of the Applicant's appeals to the Court of Appeal, this issue has been addressed by the Court when resolving the contention regarding the violation of the right to a fair trial as guaranteed by Article 7(1) of the Charter. The Court consequently finds that there was no breach of the right to information as set out in Article 9(1) of the Charter. X. 155. The Applicant's Request to be Released from Prison In his application, the Applicant requested the Court to order his release from prison. He reiterated this prayer in his Reply to the Respondent's Response. 156. The Respondent did not specifically respond to the Applicant's request to be released from prison. 157. The Court observes that an order for the Applicant's release from prison can be made only under very specific and/or, compelling circumstances.33 In the instant case, the Applicant has not set out 33 See Inter-American Court of Human Rights Case of Loayza-Tamayo v. Peru Merits. Judgment of 17 September 1997. Series C No. 33, Resolutory paragraphs 5 and 84; In this case, the Court ordered the Applicant's release since not doing so would have 6:.!