retrospective acquisition of funds from the Court yet his Counsel acted for him on a pro bono basis.” 24. On the basis of the foregoing, the Respondent prays that: i. “The Applicant's claim that reparations be set at Five Billion Tanzania Shillings (5,000,000,000.00 Tsh) are strongly disputed for being fabricated, exaggerated and blown up. The Respondent prays for the Court to dismiss the claim with costs”. ii. “The Applicant Respondent analysis be ordered to a breakdown and evidence submit to the of the alleged related thereto Court claims and and the detailed for authentication and verification before the hearing of the case”. iii The Respondent prays for dismissal of the Applicant's that his lawyer's fees for the international Court should established be by set the at the Court scale both subsidiary case on reparation. The litigation before this of the for the claims legal main Respondent aid case scheme and the maintains that this is an extraneous matter in the Application. iv. The Respondent prays for the dismissal of the prayer on the order to be issued to the Respondent Applicant's to report every three months, to the Court regarding the implementation of the Court’s orders. The Respondent states that this is e eres speculation and imaginations on the part of the Applicant. a Wu 16 @ tEAl ag > ; Fx