On the procedure: i. The granting of the extension of time ex parte to the Applicant to file the submissions on reparations was not in line with the principle of equality of arms and natural justice as it was not served on the Respondent and observations on the the Respondent request or was to not indicate allowed its to submit agreement, or otherwise, thereto. ii. There was no need for the Applicant to be granted an extension of time to file its submissions on reparations. The request for reparations was included in the main application and he was only required to submit the amount of thereafter. The Applicant's Counsel reparations were and evidence present in Court on 14 June 2013 when the Judgment was delivered, therefore, they need not have Opinions waited to receive thereto to enable the them Judgment file their and the Separate submissions on reparations. In any event, the Rules of Court do not require that an Applicant be served with the Judgment and Separate Opinions first before making submissions on reparations. iii. Even after the Applicant was granted up to 25 July 2013 to file the submissions, the date of receipt by the Registry stamped on the submissions is 29 July 2013, therefore, since the submissions were filed out of time, they should be dismissed. a wu GG de NeOS ~ O a“ CE : _