The Applicant avers that to her utmost surprise, she was later informed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs — Nigeria that Miss Mariame Kone had been illegally brought back to her employment by the 4t* Defendant who is charged with the responsibility of recruitment and administration, because they are both from the same Member State, Cote d’Ivoire. She contends that the reinstatement of Miss Kone despite her resignation from the service for a period of three (3) months was of high level disobedience by the 34 and 4t Defendants to constituted authorities and willful violation of regulations. Finally, the Applicant states that the action of the 3" and 4th Defendants is not only a clear violation of the legal regime of the ECOWAS, in the very apply institution conferred with powers as to interpret and Community texts as well as adjudicate on the issues of Human Rights violation, as in the instant case. 10. The Applicant’s alleged Human Rights violations are summed up as follows: i. The right to be equal before the law; ii. The right to have one’s case heard; iii. The right to equal access to the public service; iv. The right to equality and equal opportunity; y. The right to be free from discrimination; vi. The right of every individual to serve his Community and contribute to the best of his abilities at all times and at all Jevels; vii. Violations of the legal regime of the ECOWAS, Staff Regulations.

Select target paragraph3