* 171. The Respondent State submits that this claim for monetary compensation has no basis, as the Applicant does not establish the nexus between the alleged violations and the harm suffered by the Applicant. *** 172. The Court notes that most of the Applicant’s claims for moral damages for himself and his family are directly linked to his conviction and incarceration, which this Court did not find unlawful. The Court, therefore, dismisses the prayer for moral damages for the Applicant’s family due to the alleged prejudice to the Applicants’ family members resulting from his incarceration, which this Court did not find unlawful. 173. With regard to the moral damages claimed by the Applicant for himself in relation to the established human rights violations, the Court takes into consideration that it has already decided in favour of the restitution measure requested by the Applicant to set aside the death sentence and remove him from death row, as well as the requested guarantee of non-repetition to order the Respondent State to amend its laws to ensure respect for the right to life under Article 4 of the Charter, by removing the mandatory death sentence for the offence of murder, together with the satisfaction resulting from having established the human rights violations of Article 4 and 5 of the Charter. In these circumstances, the Court decides to grant the Applicant moral damages in the sum of Five Hundred Thousand Tanzanian Shillings (TZS 500,000) for the psychological suffering he endured. IX. COSTS 174. The Applicant prays that the costs of this Application be borne by the Respondent State. 40