was allegedly treated inhumanely and was tortured upon his arrest but does not provide any evidence to substantiate this claim. 73. In these circumstances, the Court finds that the Applicant has failed to prove the alleged violation and holds that the Respondent State did not violate his right to dignity, guaranteed in Article 5 of the Charter. VIII. REPARATIONS 74. The Court notes that Article 27(1) of the Protocol stipulates that “[i]f the Court finds that there has been violation of a human or peoples’ right, it shall make appropriate orders to remedy the violation, including the payment of fair compensation or reparation.” 75. Having found that the Respondent State has not violated any of the Applicant’s rights, the Court dismisses the Applicant’s prayers for reparations. IX. COSTS 76. The Applicant did not make any submissions on costs. 77. The Respondent State prays that costs be borne by the Applicant. *** 78. The Court notes that Rule 32(2) 26 of the Rules of Court provides that: “unless otherwise decided by the Court, each party shall bear its own costs, if any”. 26 Rule 30(2) of the Rules of Court, 2 June 2010. 19